green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Mendez
See Moore v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1054, 1055 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (concluding that a habeas petitioner may not avoid the limitations imposed on successive petitions by styling his petition as one pursuant to § 2241 rather than § 2255), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1178 , 120 S.Ct. 1214 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1115 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Keohane
See Moore v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1054, 1055 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1178 , 120 S.Ct. 1214 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1115 (2000); see also Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Mooers v. United States
See Moore v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1054, 1055 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1178 , 120 S.Ct. 1214 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1115 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quintana v. Pontesso
See Moore v. Reno, 185 F.3d 1054, 1055 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (concluding that a habeas petitioner may not avoid the limitations imposed on successive petitions by styling his petition as one pursuant to § 2241 rather than § 2255), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1178 , 120 S.Ct. 1214 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1115 (2000). 3 AFFIRMED. 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ward
See also United States v. Brown, 200 F.3d 700, 706 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1178 , 120 S.Ct. 1213 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2000) (conspiracy to commit carjacking is crime of violence). 1 At the detention hearing, the Government relied on the testimony of Dana Ward, FBI Special Agent.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Varle Caprice Wright
See United States v. Edwards, 231 F.3d 933, 935-37 (5th Cir. 2000) ("person or presence of another" requirement satisfied by proof that the victim was close enough to the vehicle to have prevented taking absent the defendant's forceful or intimidating conduct); see also United States v. Brown, 200 F.3d 700, 705 (10th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1178 (2000) (victim need not be "within easy touch" of vehicle so long as defendant's conduct caused victim to hesitate from trying to prevent the theft).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America v. Varle Caprice Wright, Also Known as \Petey
See United States v. Edwards, 231 F.3d 933, 935-37 (5th Cir.2000) (“person or presence of another” requirement satisfied by proof that the victim was close enough to the vehicle to have prevented taking absent the defendant’s forceful or intimidating conduct); see also United States v. Brown, 200 F.3d 700, 705 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1178 , 120 S.Ct. 1213 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2000) (victim need not be “within easy touch” of vehicle so long as defendant’s conduct caused victim to hesitate from trying to prevent the theft).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mosquera-Lopez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-7732.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2000.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.