green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. Holder
(2×)
See United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308, 338-40 (5th Cir. 1998) (holding that a district court possesses the inherent power to order a psychiatric examination based on 18 U.S.C. § 3593 (c), which requires that the government be given a "fair opportunity" to rebut any of defendant's mitigating evidence, and Fed.R.Crim.P. 12, which allows a court-ordered psychiatric examination during similar circumstances in the guilt phase of trials), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 829 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen
See United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308, 338-40 (5th Cir. 1998) (holding that a district court possesses the inherent power to order a psychiatric examination based on 18 U.S.C. § 3593 (c), which requires that the government be given a "fair opportunity" to rebut any of defendant's mitigating evidence, and Fed.R.Crim.P. 12, which allows a court-ordered psychiatric examination during similar circumstances in the guilt phase of trials), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 829 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Boyd
See United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308, 333 (5th Cir. 1998) (court stressed defendant’s experience in police procedure), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 829 , 120 S. Ct. 83 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ladd v. Cockrell
See also United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 829 , 120 S.Ct. 83 , 145 L.Ed.2d 70 (1999) (having relatives with criminal records race-neutral).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chanthadara
Moreover, “[a]ny vagueness in the language [of a heinous, cruel, and depraved aggravating factor] ... is cured by the limitation in the statute that the offense involve torture or serious physical abuse.” Jones, 132 F.3d at 249 (citing Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 654-55 , 110 S.Ct. 3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990)); see also United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308, 354 (5th Cir.) (applying Hall to conclude that the “especially heinous, cruel, or depraved” aggravating factor is not impermissibly vague), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 829 , 120 S.Ct. 83 , 145 L.Ed.2d 70 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120
No. 103-322, § 60012 (a), 108 Stat 1796, 1973, and we have found no pertinent legislative history revealing the reasons prompting its passage See generally Violent C nm e Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 — Conference Report, 140 Cong Rec 23,929(1994) W e note that death sentences authorized under 18 U S C § 1120(b), like other federal death sentences, must con form to statutory standards for the consideration of individual aggravating and mitigating factors which have been held to satisfy the requirements o f the Eighth Amendment See 18 U S.C. §§3591-3598 (1994 & West Supp 2000)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Peters
v.
Peters
No. 98-9200.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.