green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joseph Murl Bennett v. Glen Mueller, Warden Terhune, Director Attorney Generalof the State of California
because it is an affirmative defense and because respondents move for dismissal, respondents bear the burden of establishing that california's procedural default rules are adequate to bar federal review.
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of Washington v. Teklemariam Daniel Hagos
See State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 822-24 , 975 P.2d 967 (a defendant's hostile declarations toward victims or a racial group may be -4 No. 75569-2-1/5 probative of motive, intent, and state of mind), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999); State v. Powell, 126 Wn.2d 244, 259-63 , 893 P.2d 615 (1995)(recent events and statements involving the victim and the defendant were relevant to show ongoing hostilities between the two and were admissible as res gestae and to show motive).
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Washington, Resp. v. David C. Hindal, App.
See State v. Finch. 137 Wn.2d 792 , 844- 46, 975 P.2d 967 , cert denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duvardo v. Giurbino
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1087 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999) (Mikes rule did not apply because fingerprint evidence was supplemented with other circumstantial evidence of guilt).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Detention of Bergen
See State v. Dennison, 115 Wash.2d 609, 629 , 801 P.2d 193 (1990) (refusing to consider issues raised without citation to authority). [9] Reply Br. of Appellant at 4 (citing In re Young, 122 Wash.2d at 26 , 857 P.2d 989 ). [10] Cashaw, 123 Wash.2d at 144 , 866 P.2d 8 . [11] Id. [12] Detention of Enright, 131 Wash.App. 706, 714 , 128 P.3d 1266 (2006), review denied, 158 Wash.2d 1029 , 152 P.3d 1033 (2007). [13] Cashaw, 123 Wash.2d at 144 , 866 P.2d 8 . [14] Id. [15] Id. [16] 123 Wash.2d 138, 147 , 866 P.2d 8 (1994). [17] Id. at 146 , 866 P.2d 8 (quoting Kentucky Dep't of Corrections v. Thompson…
cited
Cited "see"
Assa'ad-Faltas v. President of University of SC
See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Univ. of S.C., No. 96-2159(L), 1998 WL 792209 (4th Cir. Nov.16, 1998) (unpublished), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Monschke
See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 845 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999); Hutchinson, 135 Wash.2d at 888 , 959 P.2d 1061 ; State v. Jennings, 111 Wash.App. 54, 61 , 44 P.3d 1 (2002) (stun belt), review denied, 148 Wash.2d 1001 , 60 P.3d 1212 (2003). ¶ 53 Here, after ruling that Monschke be required to wear a stun belt under his clothes during trial, the court instructed defense counsel to bring any visibility concerns to the court's attention.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Monschke
See State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 845 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999); Hutchinson, 135 Wn.2d at 888 ; State v. Jennings, 111 Wn.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lovelace
See United States v. Allen, 357 F.3d 745 (8th Cir.Mo. 2004), citing State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967, 1007-08 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. CJ
See generally State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 810 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. C.J.
See generally State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 810 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Silva
See State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Damon
See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 873 , 975 P.2d 967 (Talmadge, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Lee Shackleford v. Susan Hubbard, Warden
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999); Allen v. Crabtree, 153 F.3d 1030, 1032 (9th Cir.1998), cer t. denied, 525 U.S. 1091 , 119 S.Ct. 846 , 142 L.Ed.2d 700 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Sandoval v. Calderon
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1086 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Sandoval v. Calderon
See Bean v. Calderon, 163 F.3d 1073, 1086 (9th Cir.1998), cert. denied 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Souther
See State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 839 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S. Ct. 285 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sao
This argument fails. ¶23 The law in Washington is well settled that “[t]he presumption of innocence does not apply to the penalty phase in special sentencing proceedings.” State v. Benn, 120 Wn.2d 631, 668 , 845 P.2d 289 , cert. denied, 510 U.S. 944 (1993); see also State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 865 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. SAO
See also State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792, 865 , 975 P.2d 967 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billie Jerome Allen
See, e.g., State v. Finch, 975 P.2d 967, 1007-08 (Wash.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 (1999) (finding that there is no such thing as “overwhelming evidence” of the death penalty because although there can be objective evidence of a person’s guilt or evidence, such that a reviewing court can say whether a trial jury’s deliberations would have come out the same way as to the underlying offense, aggravating and mitigating factors are “of a more subjective nature . . .”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. BILLIE JEROME ALLEN, —
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967, 1007-08 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999) (finding that there is no such thing as “overwhelming evidence” of the death penalty because although there can be objective evidence of a person’s guilt or evidence, such that a reviewing court can say whether a trial jury’s deliberations would have come out the same way as to the underlying offense, aggravating and mitigating factors are “of a more subjective nature ...”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Silva
See also, United States v. Robinson, 913 F.2d 712 (9th Cir.1990) (pretrial detainee not deprived of right of access by being required to choose between appointed counsel and one box of legal materials). [33] Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1047. [34] Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1042. [35] See State v. Finch, 137 Wash.2d 792 , 975 P.2d 967 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 922 , 120 S.Ct. 285 , 145 L.Ed.2d 239 (1999). [36] State v. Kolocotronis, 73 Wash.2d 92, 97 , 436 P.2d 774 (1968); State v. Barker, 75 Wash.App. 236, 238 , 881 P.2d 1051 (1994); State v. Breedlove, 79 Wash.App. 101, 105-06 , 900 P.2d 586 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Phonometrics, Inc.
v.
International Business Machines
v.
International Business Machines
No. 98-1789.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.