Hollander v. Am. Cyanamid Co., 528 U.S. 965 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Hollander v. Am. Cyanamid Co., 528 U.S. 965 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McKettrick v. Yates (cacd, 2008-10-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McKettrick v. Yates
C.D. Cal. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vansickel v. White, 166 F.3d 953, 957 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 400 , 145 L.Ed.2d 312 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jenkins, Unpublished Decision (2-5-2003)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. (1998), 131 Ohio App.3d 1 , 21 , 721 N.E.2d 458 , dismissed, appealed not allowed 85 Ohio St.3d 1486 , 709 N.E.2d 1214 , certiorari denied 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 400 ; State v. Larsen (1993), 89 Ohio App.3d 371 , 379 , 624 N.E.2d 766 .
discussed Cited "see" Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Common Council of City of Peekskill
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co., 172 F.3d 192, 198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 399 , 145 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999); United States v. Private Sanitation Industry Assoc. of Nassau/Suffolk, Inc., 44 F.3d 1082, 1084 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, 516 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct. 50 , 133 L.Ed.2d 15 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, N.A.
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co., 172 F.3d 192, 198 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 399 , 145 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Bombero v. Warner-Lambert Co.
D. Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co., 172 F.3d 192, 198-99 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 399 , 145 L.Ed.2d 311 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Cardoza v. Healthfirst, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See *233 Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co., 172 F.3d 192, 200 (2d Cir.1999), petition for cert. denied, 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 399 , 145 L.Ed.2d 311 , 68 U.S.L.W. 3138 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Noble v. Harrison
C.D. Cal. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, “the alleged failure of Petitioner’s appellate counsel to raise the unexhausted claims ... does not establish ‘good cause.’ Appellate counsel’s alleged failure did nothing to prevent Petitioner from seeking state habeas relief for the unexhausted claims.” Hernandez, 397 F.Supp.2d at 1207 ; see also Vansickel v. White, 166 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir.) (“Attorney inadvertence or ignorance of the law does not establish cause for a procedural default.”), cer t. denied, 528 U.S. 965 , 120 S.Ct. 400 , 145 L.Ed.2d 312 (1999); Correll v. Stewart, 137 F.3d 1404, 1416 (9th Cir.) (�…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hollander
v.
American Cyanamid Co.
No. 99-339.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
528 U.S. 965
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.