discussed Cited "see" State v. Williams See United States v. Monaco, 194 F.3d 381, 386 (2d Cir. 1999) (“It is well-settled that when a statute is concerned with a continuing offense, the Ex Post Facto clause is not violated by application of a statute to an enterprise that began prior to, but continued after, the effective date of the statute.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1077 , 146 L.Ed. 2d 501 (2000); People v. Grant, 973 P.2d 72, 75 (Cal. 1999) (“In general, application of a law is retroactive only if it attaches new legal consequences to, or increases a party’s liability for, an event,…

cited Cited "see" United States v. Harry See United States v. Beers, 189 F.3d 1297, 1304 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1077 , 120 S.Ct. 1696 , 146 L.Ed.2d 501 (2000); Smith v. Sec’y of N.M.