green
Positive treatment
7.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Linda Woodman v. State
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 527 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999), cert.denied 529 U.S. 1102 (2000) (if trial court’s decision was correct on any theory of law applicable to the case, the appellate court will sustain it).
cited
Cited "see"
Eric Bledsoe v. State
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 640 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102, 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mashburn v. State
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 641 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000); Ex patte Zepeda, 819 S.W.2d 874, 876 (Tex.Crim. *8 App.1991); Kunkle, 771 S.W.2d at 439 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Lewis
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522 (Tex. Crim.App.1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000). . 921 S.W.2d at 699 . .
cited
Cited "see"
Wynn v. State
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 532 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
(2×)
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 641 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000); McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 514 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); Ex parte Zepeda, 819 S.W.2d 874, 876 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Kunkle v. State, 771 S.W.2d 435, 439 (Tex. Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 3259 , 106 L.Ed.2d 604 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 638 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) (recognizing the long-standing nature of this test under applicable Texas law), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000); Skinner v. State, 956 S.W.2d 532, 543 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) ("It is not enough that the jury may disbelieve crucial evidence pertaining to the capital offense.
cited
Cited "see"
Henderson v. Quarterman
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 639 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Campbell
App. P. 10(b)(1); see State v. Hamilton, 351 N.C. 14, 22 , 519 S.E.2d 514, 519 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 146 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Quattrocchi v. State
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 531-32 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alonzo v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cer t. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000). .
cited
Cited "see"
Charles, Derick Dewayne
See Prystash v. State , 3 S.W.3d 522, 530-32 (Tex.Cr.App. 1999), cert. denied , 529 U.S. 1102 (2000) (party cannot invite error and then complain about it on appeal).
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Shoe
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 530-32 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Fuentes v. Dretke
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 639 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hampton v. State
(2×)
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 638 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000) and Jones v. State, 984 S.W.2d 254, 257 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (“any evidence in the record from any source”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valle v. State
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522 , 541 n. 4 (Tex.Crim.App.1999)(Keller, J. concurring), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000); Johnson v. State, 853 S.W.2d 527, 535 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Levan v. State
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 638 (Tex.Cr.App.1999), ce rt. den’d, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lockett v. State
(2×)
See Martinez v. State, 1999 OK CR 33, ¶ 62 , 984 P.2d 813, 829 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000). ¶ 26 As the Supreme Court has declined to draw the Fifth Amendment protections afforded in Estelle either more broadly or more narrowly than is required by the facts of that case, we too are so limited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mario Marcos Dominguez v. State of Texas
See Medina v. State, 7 S.W.3d 633, 643-44 (Tex.Cr.App.1999), cert. den = d , 529 U.S. 1102 (2000)(finding no abuse of discretion under Rule 403 where facts were established elsewhere in the record).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saldano v. State
See Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522 (Tex.Cr.App.1999) (statutory requirement of jury charge), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000); State v. Yount, 853 S.W.2d 6 (Tex.Cr.App.1993) (statute of limitation). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. State
(2×)
See Martinez v. State, 992 P.2d 426, 432 (Okl.Cr.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Augustine
“This Court has long held that where a theory argued on appeal was not raised before the trial court, ‘the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a better mount in the Supreme Court.’ ” State v. Sharpe, 344 N.C. 190, 194 , 473 S.E.2d 3, 5 (1996) (quoting Weil v. Herring, 207 N.C..6, 10, 175 S.E. 836, 838 (1934)); see also State v. Hamilton, 351 N.C. 14, 22 , 519 S.E.2d 514, 519 (1999) (the defendant precluded on appeal from arguing admissibility of evidence for impeachment purposes when at trial he sought admission of the evidence under Rule 404(b)), …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Polk v. State
See Garcia v. State, 919 S.W.2d 370, 393-94 (Tex.Crim.App.1994) (op. on reh’g); see also Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 531 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) (distinguishing waiver from invited error), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000). 11 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Scheanette v. State
See, e.g., Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 536 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Turner v. State
Compare Jimenez v. State, 32 S.W.3d 233, 238-39 (Tex.Cr.App.2000) (unobjected-to *117 jury charge error case), with, Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522, 529-31 (Tex.Cr.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 120 S.Ct. 1840 , 146 L.Ed.2d 782 (2000) (invited jury charge error case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Israel
Id.; see also State v. Hamilton, 351 N.C. 14, 20 , 519 S.E.2d 514, 518 (1999) (evidence of knife threat to victim ten years before murder did not “point directly” to guilt of that person as perpetrator), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 , 146 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cowans
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 99-8488.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 2000.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.