Williams v. United States, 531 U.S. 1095 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. United States, 531 U.S. 1095 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[T]he testimony that Dr. Hoover gave during the guilt phase was clearly competent and more than sufficient to allow for the submission of the ... (f)(2) and (f)(6) mitigating circumstances to the jury.”
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Powell v. Lee (ncwd, 2003-09-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Powell v. Lee
W.D.N.C. · 2003 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he testimony that dr. hoover gave during the guilt phase was clearly competent and more than sufficient to allow for the submission of the ... (f)(2) and (f)(6) mitigating circumstances to the jury.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Robledo
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sager, 227 F.3d 1138, 1149 (9th Cir.2000), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 1095 , 121 S.Ct. 821 , 148 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. A. Pizano-Cornego
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carlson, 217 F.3d 986, 987-89 (8th Cir.2000), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 1095 , 121 S.Ct. 822 , 148 L.Ed.2d 706 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Demarcis L. March
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carlson, 217 F.3d 986, 987-989 (8th Cir.2000) (distinguishing Castillo and holding that § 924(c) (1) (A) (i) - (iii) involves single criminal offense with sentencing enhancement provisions, instead of multiple distinct offenses), cer t. denied, 531 U.S. 1095 , 121 S.Ct. 822 , 148 L.Ed.2d 706 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Buis
E.D. Tenn. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Williams, 224 F.3d 530, 532-33 (6th Cir.2000) (finding probable cause from an affidavit that relied on a confidential informant who had previously provided information leading to arrests and convictions, but where the affiant also mentioned his own personal knowledge regarding the sale of drugs at the location to be searched and the affiant separately informed the issuing judge about police surveillance of the residence), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1095 , 121 S.Ct. 821 , 148 L.Ed.2d 704 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ferguson
6th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Williams, 224 F.3d 530, 532-33 (6th Cir.2000) (finding probable cause from an affidavit that relied on a confidential informant who had previously provided information leading to arrests and convictions, but where the affiant also mentioned his own personal knowledge regarding the sale of drugs at the location to be searched and the affiant separately informed the issuing judge about police surveillance of the residence), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1095 , 121 S.Ct. 821 , 148 L.Ed.2d 704 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
No. 00-7049.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
531 U.S. 1095
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: W.D. North Carolina (1)

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.