In re Mensah, 533 U.S. 915 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Mensah, 533 U.S. 915 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“an employer's free speech right ... is not absolute, however, and must be balanced against the employees' rights ... to be free of coercion”
51 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: R Alexander Acosta v. Austin Elec. Servs. LLC (azd, 2018-08-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) R Alexander Acosta v. Austin Elec. Servs. LLC
D. Ariz. · 2018 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
an employer's free speech right ... is not absolute, however, and must be balanced against the employees' rights ... to be free of coercion
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.
Fed. Cir. · 2003 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
festo vii
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Gutierrez
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Gindlesperger, 706 A.2d 1216, 1225 (Pa.Super.1997), affirmed, 560 Pa. 222 , 743 A.2d 898 (1999), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2519 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rybicki
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lerman v. Bd. of Elections of New York, 232 F.3d 135 , 144 n. 10 (2d Cir.2000) (“It is not even clear that Salerno’s ‘no set of circumstances’ test articulates an exclusive standard for making facial challenges outside the First Amendment context, as a plurality of the Supreme Court recently has noted.” (citing Morales, 527 U.S. at 55 n. 22, 119 S.Ct. 1849 ) (emphasis in original)), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rybicki
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lerman v. Bd. of Elections of New York, 232 F.3d 135 , 144 n. 10 (2d Cir.2000) ("It is not even clear that Salerno 's `no set of circumstances' test articulates an exclusive standard for making facial challenges outside the First Amendment context, as a plurality of the Supreme Court recently has noted." (citing Morales, 527 U.S. at 55 n. 22, 119 S.Ct. 1849 ) (emphasis in original)), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Wright
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: accord · confidence high
Examining such materials is consistent with the principle that a court may not dismiss a pro se complaint unless it is “beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 521 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per cu-riam) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)); accord Lerman v. Bd. of Elections, 232 F.3d 135 , 140 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2520 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Old Town Canoe Co. v. GLENWA, INC.
D. Or. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 234 F.3d 558, 564 (Fed.Cir.2000), cert. granted, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2519 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001).
cited Cited "see" AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac & Ugine
S.D. Ohio · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 234 F.3d 558 (Fed.Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. granted, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2519 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 , 69 U.S.L.W. 3779 (U.S.2001).
discussed Cited "see" Cordis Corp. v. Medtronic AVE, Inc.
D. Del. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 234 F.3d 558, 585 (Fed.Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. granted, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2519 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 , 69 U.S.L.W. 3673 (U.S. June 18, 2001) (No. 00-1543).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jones v. City of Philadelphia
Pa. Commw. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gindlesperger, 560 Pa. 222 , 226 n. 3, 743 A.2d 898 , 899 n. 3 (1999) (noting because the warrantless use of thermal imaging device violated the Fourth Amendment, "it is clear that this conduct likewise violates Article I, Section 8”), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 , 121 S.Ct. 2519 , 150 L.Ed.2d 692 (2001); Commonwealth v. Matos, 543 Pa. 449 , 672 A.2d 769 (1996) (see infra pp. 19-20); Commonwealth v. Martin, 534 Pa. 136 , 626 A.2d 556 (1993) (holding that, under enhanced privacy protections of Article I, Section 8, a canine sniff of a person is a search and requires …
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stangel v. A-1 Freeman N Amer
5th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c) & (d); see also, e.g., Heaton v. Monogram Credit Card Bank of Ga., 231 F.3d 994, 997 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 915 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Mensah
No. 00-1671.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 2001.
533 U.S. 915
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: D. Arizona (1) · Federal Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.