green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Robins v. City of East Wenatchee
Coleman v. Quaker Oats 7 Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1281 (9th Cir. 2000), cert. denied sub nom. 533 U.S. 950 8 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Riesgo v. Edward D. Sultan Co.
See Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1282 (9th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2592 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001); Chuang v. Univ. of Cal. Davis, Bd. of Trs., 225 F.3d 1115, 1126 (9th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company
See Geraghty and Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc., 234 F.3d 917, 929 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2592 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001); Freeman v. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., 189 F.3d 160, 164 (2d Cir. 1999); Pneumo Abex Corp. v. High Point, Thomasville and Denton R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton International, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co.
See Geraghty and Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc., 234 F.3d 917, 929 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2592 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001); Freeman v. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc., 189 F.3d 160, 164 (2d Cir.1999); Pneumo Abex Corp. v. High Point, Thomasville and Denton R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Liggett Group, Inc. v. Engle
See Carter v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 778 So.2d 932 (Fla.2000) (statute of limitations begins to run when plaintiff discovers a smoking-related injury), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2593 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001); Korman, 825 F.Supp. at 1015 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dean v. Baltas
See Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1291-92 (9th Cir.2000) (district court did not err in refusing to entertain new theory of liability raised for first time at summary judgment stage), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2592 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Gompper v. Visx, Inc.
See Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1295 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2592 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Gompper v. Visx
See Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1295 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 950 , 121 S.Ct. 2592 , 150 L.Ed.2d 751 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry Stephens v. State of Tennessee
See Mendiola v. Schomig, 224 F.3d 589, 593 (7th Cir. 2000) (trial judge heard witness’s trial testimony “which supplied ample basis for the judge to disbelieve a later inconsistent story”), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 121 S. Ct. 2591 , 150 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robidoux v. O'BRIEN
Compare Wilson v. Workman, 577 F.3d 1284, 1292 (10th Cir.2009) (en banc), and Taylor v. Maddox, 366 F.3d 992, 1001 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1038 , 125 S.Ct. 809 , 160 L.Ed.2d 605 (2004), with Lambert v. Blackwell, 387 F.3d 210 , 238 (3d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1063 , 125 S.Ct. 2516 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1114 (2005), and Mendiola v. Schomig, 224 F.3d 589, 592-93 (7th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 949 , 121 S.Ct 2591 , 150 L.Ed.2d 750 (2001). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Corp., 786 F.Supp. 971, 975-76 (N.D.Ga.1991) (contribution action can proceed regardless of action brought pursuant to sections 9606 or 9607); Alloy Briquetting Corp. v. Niagara Vest, Inc., 756 F.Supp. 713, 718 (W.D.N.Y.1991); see also Geraghty & Miller, Inc. v. Conoco, Inc., 234 F.3d 917, 924-25 (5th Cir.2000) (implicitly recognizing that a contribution action can proceed without a cost recovery action by stating that where “there has been no prior section 107 cost-recovery action, a contribution action ... must be brought within” the appropriate limitations period), cert. denied, 533 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.W. v. THE JERSEY CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION JEFFREY v. OSOWSKI, FORMER DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION BARBARA GANTWERK, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS SYLVIA ELIAS, FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES PRISCILLA PETROSKY, ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION JOHN IWANOWSKI MARY HEPBURN JOAN EDMISTON DENISE BRAAK MARY MACEACHERN EDWARD FAUERBACH, LEARNING DISABILITIES TEACHER-CONSULTANTS NORMA CHRISOMALIS GWENDOLYN JACKSON LINDA COLON RONNE BASSMAN WILLIAM RONZITTI ROXANNE JOHNSON, SUPERVISORS OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SHANETTE GREEN, TEACHER MELINDA ZANGRILLO, COORDINATOR OF COMPLIANCE JANE DOE AND JOHN DOE (1) — (5), ALL IN THEIR OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION JEFFREY v. OSOWSKI BARBARA GANTWERK MELINDA ZANGRILLO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERVENOR
See, e.g., Jim C. v. United States, 235 F.3d 1079, 1082 (8th Cir.2000) (en banc) (noting that Arkansas's sacrifice of 12 percent of education budget "would be politically painful" but not compulsive), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 949 , 121 S.Ct. 2591 , 150 L.Ed.2d 750 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.W. v. Jersey City Public Schools
See, e.g., Jim C. v. United States, 235 F.3d 1079, 1082 (8th Cir.2000) (en banc) (noting that Arkansas’s sacrifice of 12 percent of education budget “would be politically painful” but not compulsive), cer t. denied, 533 U.S. 949 , 121 S.Ct. 2591 , 150 L.Ed.2d 750 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Department of Justice
v.
Maydak
v.
Maydak
No. 00-1507.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 29, 2001.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.