Respass v. Connecticut, 534 U.S. 1002 (2001). · Go Syfert
Respass v. Connecticut, 534 U.S. 1002 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Massaro (connappct, 2021-07-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Massaro
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 186 , 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Melendez
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 188 n.19, 770 A.2d 471 (assuming, without deciding, that remedy of renewal of plea offer may be appropriate for state’s tardy disclosure of incriminating evidence), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see" Respass v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164 , 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Wilson F.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 184 , 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Centeno
Conn. · 2002 · signal: accord · confidence high
Whether a prehminary inquiry of counsel, or some other hmited form of proceeding, will lead to further, more extensive, proceedings will depend on what is disclosed during the initial hmited proceedings and on the exercise of the trial court’s sound discretion with respect thereto.” Id.; accord State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 190-91 , 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Griffin
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 615 (2016); see also State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 175 , 770 A.2d 471 (‘‘an informant’s verac- ity or reliability and basis of knowledge should be regarded as closely intertwined issues that may usefully illuminate the [commonsense], practical question of the existence of probable cause’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jackson
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 186 , 770 A.2d 471 , cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Wells
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Respass, 256 Conn. 164, 192-93 , 770 A.2d 471 (waiver occurred when court “explicitly gave both parties opportunities to conduct further inquiry, and both parties declined. . . . [I]f the defendant perceived the trial court’s inquiry as inadequate, then he would have complained during the inquiry process instead of waiting until after the jury had reached a verdict.” [Citation omitted.]), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1002 , 122 S. Ct. 478 , 151 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Respass
v.
Connecticut
No. 01-6061.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 2001.
534 U.S. 1002
Published

Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.