discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Scott v. Werholtz hile the failure to advance an established legal theory may result in ineffective assistance of counsel under strickland, the failure to advance a novel theory never will.

discussed Cited "see" State v. Robinson (2×) See State v. Stout, 46 S.W.3d 689, 706 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 998 , 122 S.Ct. 471 , 151 L.Ed.2d 386 (2001).

cited Cited "see" Delbert Lee Harris v. State of Tennessee See State v. Stout, 46 S.W.3d 689, 700 (Tenn. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 998 , 122 S. Ct. 471 (2001).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Harris See, e.g., United States v. Green, 55 M.J. 76, 81 (C.A.A.F.) (discussing inferences of knowing use of illegal drugs and stating that “[a] urinalysis . . . provides a legally sufficient basis upon which to draw the permissive inference of knowing, wrongful use”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 998 (2001).