Woodall v. United States, 535 U.S. 1099 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Woodall v. United States, 535 U.S. 1099 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (50 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. McDowell, R. (pasuperct, 2018-01-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Com. v. McDowell, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealtlt v. Natividad, 565 Pa. 348 , 773 A.2d 167, 176 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1099 , 122 S. Ct. 2300 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Harris
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Natividad, 565 Pa. 348 , 773 A.2d 167 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1099 , 122 S.Ct. 2300 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2002); Commonwealth v. Johnson, 542 Pa. 384 , 668 A.2d 97 (1995), cert. denied 519 U.S. 827 , 117 S.Ct. 90 , 136 L.Ed.2d 46 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bobby Marshall Zidell (2×)
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Stewart, 306 F.3d 295, 312 (6th Cir.2002). 5 Regarding the specific matter of jury instructions, this review entails consideration “whether the charge, taken as a whole, fairly and adequately submits the issues and applicable law to the jury.” United States v. Alvarez, 266 F.3d 587, 594 (6th Cir.2001) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1098 , 122 S.Ct. 2298 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1055 (2002). 1.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jackson
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Price, 265 F.3d 1097, 1108-09 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1099 , 122 S.Ct. 2299 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2002); United States v. Lott, 310 F.3d 1231, 1242-43 (10th Cir.2002). 3 As a result, on remand, the district court was required by § 5G1.2(d) to impose consecutive sentences in order to reach the thirty-year prison term it originally imposed under the sentencing guidelines, and the imposition of the consecutive sentences was not error under Apprendi since none of the individual sentences exceeded the twenty-year statutory maximum.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Wingo
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Graham , we implicitly rejected the holding of Velasquez, 304 F.3d at 243 -44 — that the district court has discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences under § 5G1.2 — and held with most of our sister circuits that § 5G1.2(d) mandates the imposition of consecutive sentences when its terms are met. 327 F.3d at 465-66 ; see also United States v. Price, 265 F.3d 1097, 1108-09 (10th Cir.2001) (listing other circuits holding the same), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1099 , 122 S.Ct. 2299 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2002); United States v. White, 238 F.3d 537, 543 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 532…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woodall
v.
United States
01-7842.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 2002.
535 U.S. 1099
Published

535 U.S. 1099

WOODALL
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-7842.

Supreme Court of the United States.

May 28, 2002.

1

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 F. 3d 1144.