Desmond v. Bankamerica Corp., 535 U.S. 970 (2002). · Go Syfert
Desmond v. Bankamerica Corp., 535 U.S. 970 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Boeing Co. v. United States (uscfc, 2005-12-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Boeing Co. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. SM, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002); Celeritas Tech., Ltd. v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 150 F.3d 1354, 1361 (Fed.Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1106 , 119 S.Ct. 874 , 142 L.Ed.2d 774 (1999); Structural Rubber Prods.
cited Cited "see" Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Tex. Att'y Gen. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 5 791.006(a) (Vernon Supp. 2003).
discussed Cited "see" LILLIAN PEBBLES MORRISON v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., MARK F. SHANKLE, SR. v. PEP BOYS — MANNY, MOE & JACK, INC. (2×)
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Burden v. Check into Cash of Ky., LLC, 267 F.3d 483, 492 (6th Cir.2001) ("As to the potentially burdensome costs of arbitration, the party resisting arbitration has the burden of showing the likelihood that arbitration would be prohibitively expensive.'') (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Network Appliance, Inc. v. Bluearc Corp.
N.D. Cal. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sandisk Corp. v. Lexar Media, Inc., 91 F.Supp.2d 1327, 1336 (N.D.Cal.2000) (Breyer, J.) (observing that there can be no anticipation of a patent “[ujnless all the elements are found in a single piece of prior art in exactly the same situation and united the same way to perform the identical function”); see also Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed.Cir.2001) (“To anticipate, every element and limitation of the claimed invention must be found in a single prior art reference, arranged as in the claim.”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fazio v. LEHMAN BROTHERS INC.
N.D. Ohio · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Co., 388 U.S. 395, 403-04 , 87 S.Ct. 1801 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1270 (1967); see also Burden v. Check Into Cash of Kentucky, LLC, 267 F.3d 483, 488 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 970 , 122 S.Ct. 1436 , 152 L.Ed.2d 380 (2002); Ferro, 142 F.3d at 931, 933 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Desmond
v.
Bankamerica Corp.
01-1084.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 2002.
535 U.S. 970
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

535 U.S. 970

DESMOND ET AL.
v.
BANKAMERICA CORP. ET AL.

No. 01-1084.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 1, 2002.

1

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F. 3d 795.