green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ficken
See United States v. Bollin, 264 F.3d 391, 413 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 303 , 151 L.Ed.2d 225 (2001), and cert. denied, 535 U.S. 989 , 122 S.Ct. 1544 , 152 L.Ed.2d 469 (2002); United States v. Peterson, 100 F.3d 7, 13-14 (2d Cir.1996) (noting that “when a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment privilege, he has made himself unavailable to any other party, but he is not unavailable to himself” and thus that it was within the district court’s discretion to exclude the defendant's prior grand jury testimony when the defendant asserted the privilege at trial); Un…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cooper
Like the other fraud statutes, the bank fraud statute is meant to punish “each execution of a fraudulent scheme rather than each act in furtherance of such a scheme.” Id. at 323 (quotation and citations omitted); see United States v. De La Mata, 266 F.3d 1275, 1287 (11th Cir.2001) (“The unit of the offense created by § 1344 is each execution or attempted execution of the scheme to defraud, not each act in furtherance thereof.” (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 989 , 122 S.Ct. 1543 , 152 L.Ed.2d 469 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dunne
Rather, it “is, in general, [an offense] that involves a prolonged course of conduct,” and “its commission is not complete until the conduct has run its course.” United States v. Rivera-Ventura, 72 F.3d 277, 281 (2d Cir.1995); see also United States v. De La Mata, 266 F.3d 1275, 1288 (11th Cir.2001) (holding that “[a] continuing offense is one which is not complete upon the first act, but instead continues to be perpetrated over time”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 989 , 122 S.Ct. 1543 , 152 L.Ed.2d 469 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meneilly
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-1310.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2002.
Published
MENEILLY
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-1310.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 15, 2002.
1
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 28 Fed. Appx. 26.