green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Robinson
e hold that dismissal of an indictment is not an available form of relief where the notice requirement of the iad is violated, even when that violation is attributable to the receiving state, here the united states.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowrance v. Trow
See United States v. Lopez-Lopez, 282 F3d 1, 17 (1st Cir), cert den, 536 US 949 (2002) (“Agent Velez, at trial, adopted his allegedly inconsistent suppression hearing testimony when he affirmatively stated that the correct time could have been two or three seconds rather than five seconds.”); United States v. Klein, 488 F2d 481, 483 (2d Cir 1973), cert den, 419 US 1091 (1974) (“If [the witness] had said explicitly that her grand jury testimony was the truth, this principle would sustain the judge’s ruling [allowing the prosecutor to read that witness’s grand jury testimony to the jur…
cited
Cited "see"
Ruben Lopez-Lopez v. Linda Sanders
See United States v. Lopez-Lopez, 282 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2642 , 153 L.Ed.2d 821 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Gerald Gamboa
See United States v. Johnson, 278 F.3d 749, 751-52 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2642 , 153 L.Ed.2d 821 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Gamboa
See United States v. Johnson, 278 F.3d 749, 751-52 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Souffront, Kent R.
See United States v. Wallace, 280 F.3d 781, 784 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2641 , 153 L.Ed.2d 820 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Souffront
See United States v. Wallace, 280 F.3d 781, 784 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2641 , 153 L.Ed.2d 820 (2002). 99 Section 4B1.1 mandates that when the defendant is at least eighteen years old at the time of conviction in the current case, and the current conviction is a felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense, and the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense, the criminal history is Category VI, that of a career offender.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doe
See United States v. Norris, 281 F.3d 357, 360-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2641 , 153 L.Ed.2d 820 (2002); United States v. Thomas, 274 F.3d 655, 663-64 (2d Cir.2001) (in banc).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Graham
Accord, United States v. Lopez-Lopez, 282 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2642 , 153 L.Ed.2d 821 (2002); United States v. Kenny, 645 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 920 , 101 S.Ct. 3059 , 69 L.Ed.2d 425 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pero
See, e.g., United States v. Lualemaga, 280 F. 3d 1260, 1263-64 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 949 , 122 S.Ct. 2641 , 153 L.Ed. 2d 820 (2002); United States v. Walker, 255 F. 3d 540, 542-43 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. Pena-Corea, 165 F. 3d 819, 821-22 (11th Cir.1999); Lara v. Johnson, 141 F. 3d 239, 243 (5th Cir.1998) ("[D]ismissal because of negligence on the part of the sending state is not a part of the IAD"), mod. on other grounds, 149 F. 3d 1226 (5th Cir.1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Norris
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-10356.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)
NORRIS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-10356.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 24, 2002.
1
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 281 F. 3d 357.