green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“he structure and plain text of 841 affords no support for a requirement that the government must prove more than the defendant's knowledge that he was trafficking in a controlled substance.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. John L. Brower
he structure and plain text of 841 affords no support for a requirement that the government must prove more than the defendant's knowledge that he was trafficking in a controlled substance.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wade
See United States v. Jones, 289 F.3d 1260, 1264 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 (2002); United States v. Behrman, 235 F.3d 1049, 1052 (7th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Huff, No. 02-2310, 2003 WL 23095560 , at *2 (6th Cir. Dec. 11, 2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Allen McDaniel (03-1940) and Gregory Warren Wade (03-2073)
See United States v. Jones, 289 F.3d 1260, 1264 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 661 , 154 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002); United States v. Behrman, 235 F.3d 1049, 1052 (7th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Huff, 83 Fed.Appx. 792, 794 , 2003 WL 23095560 , at *2 (6th Cir. Dec.ll, 2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bishop
See United States v. Bradshaw, 281 F.3d 278, 281 (1st Cir.2002), cer t.3 denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 660 , 154 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
McCormick v. State
Wallace v. Morrison, 87 F.3d 1271, 1274-75 (11th Cir.1996); see also King v. Moore, 196 F.3d 1327, 1335 (11th Cir.1999) ("When the motives for striking a prospective juror are both racial and legitimate, Batson error arises only if the legitimate reasons were not in themselves sufficient reason for striking the juror."); accord Gattis v. Snyder, 278 F.3d 222, 235 (3d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 660 , 154 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002); Weaver v. Bowersox, 241 F.3d 1024, 1032 (8th Cir.2001); Jones v. Plaster, 57 F.3d 417, 421 (4th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elliott v. State
See also Gattis v. Snyder, 278 F.3d 222, 235 (3d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 660 , 154 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002); Wallace v. Morrison, 87 F.3d 1271, 1274-75 (11th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1044 , 117 S.Ct. 616 , 136 L.Ed.2d 540 (1996); United States v. Darden, 70 F.3d 1507, 1531 (8th Cir.1995) (same), cert. denied, 517 U.S. *720 1149, 116 S.Ct. 1449 , 134 L.Ed.2d 569 , cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1026 , 116 S.Ct. 2567 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1996); Guzman v. State, 85 S.W.3d 242, 244 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gillaum, Durriel E.
See, e.g., United States v. Lemons, 302 F.3d 769 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 (2002); United States v. Mitchell, 299 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, sub nom., Peete v. United States, 537 U.S. 1130 (2003); United States v. Wesela, 223 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Durriel E. Gillaum
See, e.g., United States v. Lemons, 302 F.3d 769 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 642 , 154 L.Ed.2d 523 (2002); United States v. Mitchell, 299 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, sub nom., Peete v. United States, 537 U.S. 1130 , 123 S.Ct. 908 , 154 L.Ed.2d 817 (2003); United States v. Wesela, 223 F.3d 656 (7th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Durriel E. Gillaum
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lemons, 302 F.3d 769 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 642 , 154 L.Ed.2d 523 (2002); United States v. Mitchell, 299 F.3d 632 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, sub nom., Peete v. United States, 537 U.S. 1130 , 123 S.Ct. 908 , 154 L.Ed.2d 817 (2003); United States v. Wesela, 223 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gillaum, Durriel E.
See, e.g., United States v. Lemons, 302 F.3d 769 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 (2002); United States v. Mitchell, 299 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, sub nom., Peete v. United States, 537 U.S. 1130 (2003); United States v. Wesela, 223 F.3d 656 (7th Cir. 2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Contreras-Hernandez
Id. at 1285-86 ; see also United States v. O’Hara, 301 F.3d 563, 571 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 611 , 154 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002) (noting that district courts retain discretion to depart when § 5G1.2(d) mandates consecutive sentences).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradshaw
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-5015.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
BRADSHAW
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-5015.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 2, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 281 F. 3d 278.