green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Marshall v. AT & T MOBILITY
ADA Claims In order to maintain a claim under the ADA, Plaintiff must present evidence to show that 1) he is a qualified person with a disability under the ADA, and 2) that the defendant is subject to suit under that statute. 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (a); see Pollard v. High’s of Baltimore, Inc., 281 F.3d 462, 467 (4th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 827 , 123 S.Ct. 122 , 154 L.Ed.2d 39 (2002); Tyndall v. National Education Centers, 31 F.3d 209, 212 (4th Cir.1994); Hooven-Lewis v. Caldera, 249 F.3d 259, 268 (4th Cir.2001) [same standards apply to ADA and Rehabilitation Act]. 12 Defendant has not…
cited
Cited "see"
Bernier v. Bernier
See Gross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 212 F.3d 333, 344-347 (6th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 827 (2002) (Gross).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paris v. Arc/Davidson County, Inc.
(2×)
Plaintiffs ADA Claims Plaintiff alleges that “[ARC] terminated Plaintiff because of her disability and request for reasonable accommodations.” (Pl.’s Compl. ¶ 37.) Plaintiff also alleges that “[ARC’s] failure to make reasonable accommodations to Plaintiffs disability constitutes discrimination against her with respect to the terms, conditions, and privileges of employment and constitutes a violation of the ADA.” (Pl.’s Compl. ¶ 39.) Title I of the ADA prohibits discrimination by a covered entity, including a private employer, “against a qualified individual with a disability …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Insurance Co.
v.
Jones Et Ux
v.
Jones Et Ux
01-1883.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 827
Published
FEDERAL INSURANCE CO.
v.
JONES ET UX.
No. 01-1883.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.