green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“We ... ‘eschew[ ] reliance on the passing comments of one Member, and casual statements from the floor debates.’ ”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"We ... `eschew[] reliance on the passing comments of one Member, and casual statements from the floor debates.'"
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
we ... 'eschew reliance on the passing comments of one member, and casual statements from the floor debates.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kirk Gayle, Ann-Marie Richardson, Rohan Ingram
See United States v. Nelson, 277 F.3d 164, 186 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 835 , 123 S.Ct. 145 , 154 L.Ed.2d 54 (2002). 4 Resort *94 to authoritative legislative history may be justified where there is an open question as to the meaning of a word or phrase in a statute, or where a statute is silent on an issue of fundamental importance to its correct application.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sean Allen, United States of America v. Eric Adam Dixon, United States of America v. Jeremiah Skidmore, United States of America v. Jason Guy Potter, United States of America v. Ryan Flaherty, United States of America v. Michael Flom
(2×)
See United States v. Nelson, 277 F.3d 164 , 191 n. 28 (2d Cir.) ("[P]rivate violence motivated by a discriminatory animus against members of a race or religion, etc., who use public facilities, etc., is anything but intrinsically a matter of purely local concern."), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 835 , 123 S.Ct. 145 , 154 L.Ed.2d 54 (2002); United States v. Furrow, 125 F.Supp.2d 1178, 1185 (C.D.Cal.2000) ("Far from intruding into a matter of purely local concern, [§ 245] regulates matters that Congress and the courts have recognized as `truly national.'").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allen
(2×)
See United States v. Nelson, 277 F.3d 164 , 191 n. 28 (2d Cir.) (“[P]rivate violence motivated by a discriminatory animus against members of a race or religion, etc., who use public facilities, etc., is anything but intrinsically a matter of purely local concern.”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 835 , 123 S.Ct. 145 , 154 L.Ed.2d 54 (2002); United States v. Furrow, 125 F.Supp.2d 1178, 1185 (C.D.Cal.2000) (“Far from intruding into a matter of purely local concern, [§ 245] regulates matters that Congress and the courts have recognized as ‘truly national.’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spears v. Mullin
(2×)
See, e.g., Neill v. Gibson, 278 F.3d 1044, 1054, 1057 (10th Cir.2001), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 835 , 123 S.Ct. 145 , 154 L.Ed.2d 54 (2002); McCracken v. Gibson, 268 F.3d 970, 976 (10th Cir.2001), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 841 , 123 S.Ct. 165 , 154 L.Ed.2d 64 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Caudill v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See also Woodall v. Commonwealth, Ky., 63 S.W.3d 104, 119 (2002) ("[A] juror is disqualified if he or she cannot consider the minimum penalty ...."), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 835 , 123 S.Ct. 145 , 154 L.Ed.2d 54 (2002); Hodge v. Commonwealth, Ky., 17 S.W.3d 824, 837 (1999), cert. denied 531 U.S. 1018 , 121 S.Ct. 581 , 148 L.Ed.2d 498 (2000). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slaughter v. Mullin
See English v. Cody, 146 F.3d 1257, 1263, 1264 (10th Cir.1998); see also, e.g., Neill v. Gibson, 278 F.3d 1044, 1054, 1058 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 835 , 123 S.Ct. 145 , 154 L.Ed.2d 54 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tully
v.
Virginia
v.
Virginia
01-10139.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
TULLY
v.
VIRGINIA.
No. 01-10139.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA.
2
Sup.Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.