green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Darling v. State
See Darling v. Florida, 537 U.S. 848 , 123 S.Ct. 190 , 154 L.Ed.2d 78 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Arnold v. State
See Darling v. State, 808 So.2d 145, 155 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 848 , 123 S.Ct. 190 , 154 L.Ed.2d 78 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. State
Accord, e.g., Darling v. State, 808 So.2d 145 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 848 , *168 123 S.Ct. 190 , 154 L.Ed.2d 78 (2002); Johnson v. State, 442 So.2d 193 (Fla.1983)(possible omissions in trial transcript do not warrant new trial unless defendant can demonstrate prejudice in presentation of case), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 963 , 104 S.Ct. 2181 , 80 L.Ed.2d 563 (1984); Pickens v. Lockhart, 542 F.Supp. 585, 602 (E.D.Ark.1982)(fact that transcript of voir dire was destroyed by fire does not require new trial when "none of the witnesses who testified in the habeas hearing had any specific cri…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atkins
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
01-10546.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
ATKINS
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.
No. 01-10546.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.