Adams v. United States Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California (Palmer, Warden, Real Party in Interest), 537 U.S. 898 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Adams v. United States Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of California (Palmer, Warden, Real Party in Interest), 537 U.S. 898 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Slaughter (moctapp, 2008-11-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Slaughter (2×)
Mo. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Howell, 838 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Mo.App.1992) (“The law is well established in Missouri that the silence of an accused while under arrest is not admissible against him.”) However, the facts in this case do not substantiate that a manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. “[Wjhile it is improper to use a defendant’s post-arrest post -Miranda silence ‘either as affirmative proof of a defendant’s guilt or to impeach his testimony,’ State v. Howell, 838 S.W.2d [at 161], a defendant’s silence can be mentioned if it is not used for either of those purposes.”…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
United States District Court for the Central District of California (Palmer, Warden, Real Party in Interest)
02-5157.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 898
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

537 U.S. 898

ADAMS
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (PALMER, WARDEN, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST).

No. 02-5157.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.