Parke v. United States, 537 U.S. 902 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Parke v. United States, 537 U.S. 902 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
111 citation events (111 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Jose A. B. (conn, 2022-03-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jose A. B.
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
At step two, we [t]raditionally . . . have applied the Blockburger test to determine whether two statutes criminalize the same offense, thus placing a defendant prosecuted under both statutes in double jeopardy: [When] the same act or transaction constitutes a viola- tion of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.’’ (Citations omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 655 ; see State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 125 , …
cited Cited "see" Lyme Land Conservation Trust, Inc. v. Platner
Conn. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 132 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Henderson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda , 260 Conn. 93 , 127, 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 224 , 154 L.Ed.2d 175 (2002) ; State v. Snook , [ 210 Conn. 244 , 264, 555 A.2d 390 , cert. denied, 492 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 3258 , 106 L.Ed.2d 603 (1989) ] ...
cited Cited "see" State v. Wright
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 127 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Johnson
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 129 , 794 A.2d 506 (indicating that, when reviewing court remands case for resentencing pursuant to aggregate package theory, ‘‘the proper remedy is to vacate [the sentence] in its entirety’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Tabone
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Hudson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 129-30 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Beaulieu
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 122-24 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Fana
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 110 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. IBAN C.
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 129-30 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Miranda
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. James G.
Conn. · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
Ed. 2d 185 (1975); accord State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 102-103 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Crudup
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
The defendant is correct that he may have a legal duty to protect his child; see State v. Miranda, 245 Conn. 209, 228-30 , 715 A.2d 680 (1998) (recognizing duty to protect extends beyond that in traditional roles), on appeal after remand, 260 Conn. 93 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Banks
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henry, 288 F.3d 657, 660-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 224 , 154 L.Ed.2d 176 (2002).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Banks
5th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henry, 288 F.3d 657, 660-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 224 , 154 L.Ed.2d 176 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kirsch
Conn. · 2003 · signal: accord · confidence high
Ed. 306 (1932). ‘This test is a technical one and examines only the statutes, charging instruments, and bill of particulars as opposed to the evidence presented at trial.’ ” State v. Nixon, 231 Conn. 545, 550-51 , 651 A.2d 1264 (1995); accord State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 125 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tinsley
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 125 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Chase Home Finance, LLC v. Scroggin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 131 , 794 A.2d 506 (‘‘[§] 51-183c applies exclusively to ‘trials’ ’’), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Porter
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93 , 121, 794 A.2d 506 (2002) (information charged defendant with two counts of assault in first degree "on diverse dates and times between October, 1992, and January 27,1993" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 224 , 154 L.Ed.2d 175 (2002) ; State v. Howard F. , 86 Conn.App. 702 , 704, 862 A.2d 331 (2004) (information charged defendant with two counts of risk of injury "between July 1, 2000, and March 24, 2001"), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1032 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barlow v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93 , 131, 794 A.2d 506 (§ 51-183c does not apply to sentencing hearings), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S.Ct. 224 , 154 L.Ed.2d 175 (2002) ; Board of Education v. East Haven Education Assn., supra, 66 Conn.App. at 216 , 784 A.2d 958 (§ 51-183c does not apply to pretrial hearings or short calendar hearings).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morales
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Brown, 299 Conn. 640 , 653–54, 11 A.3d 663 (2011); State v. Kulmac, 230 Conn. 43 , 67–69, 644 A.2d 887 (1994).’’ State v. Shenkman, 154 Conn. App. 45 , 68 n.12, 104 A.3d 780 (2014), cert. denied, 315 Conn. 921 , 107 A.3d 959 (2015); see also, e.g., State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 124 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Urbanowski
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
The same transaction, in other words, may constitute separate and distinct crimes where it is susceptible of separation into parts, each of which in itself constitutes a completed offense. . . . [T]he test is not whether the criminal intent is one and the same and inspiring the whole transaction, but whether separate acts have been committed with the requisite criminal intent and are such as are made pun- ishable by the [statute].’’ (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Brown, supra, 299 Conn. 652 ; see also State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93 , 122–23, 794 A.2d 506 (…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Santiago
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 126-27 , 794 A.2d 506 (concluding that assault in the first degree and risk of injury to a child are separate and distinct offense for double jeopardy purposes), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Browne
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Miranda, 260 Conn. 93, 118-24 , 794 A.2d 506 (conviction on two counts of assault in first degree as to sole victim in same time frame not double jeopardy), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Murdock v. Croughwell
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although this court consistently has taken the position that children outside the supervision of their parents require special protection; see, e.g., State v. Miranda, 245 Conn. 209, 230 , 715 A.2d 680 (1998) (imposing duty on live-in boyfriend to protect unrelated child from mother’s abuse), appeal after remand, 260 Conn. 93 , 794 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 902 , 123 S. Ct. 224 , 154 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Parke
v.
United States
02-5234.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
537 U.S. 902
Published

537 U.S. 902

PARKE
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-5234.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 7, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 Fed. Appx. 72.