green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Dretke
See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 341 (5th Cir.) (holding trial counsel acted in an objectively reasonable manner in relying on the state trial judge’s generic juror screening questions and the jurors’ written questionnaire answers to identify those members of the jury venire who were unqualified for jury service), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke
See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 341 (5th Cir.2002) (holding trial counsel acted in an objectively reasonable manner in relying on the state trial judge’s generic juror screening questions and the jurors’ written questionnaire answers to identify those members of the jury venire who were unqualified for jury service), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gutierrez v. Dretke
See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 341 (5th Cir.) (holding trial counsel acted in an objectively reasonable manner in relying on the state trial judge's generic juror screening questions and the jurors' written questionnaire answers to identify those members of the jury venire who were unqualified for jury service), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002). 133 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwayne A. Berger
See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 339 (5th Cir.2002) (“Several federal courts of appeals have held that there is no constitutional right to counsel for post-appeal motions for new trial.”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002); Trenkler v. United States, 268 F.3d 16, 20 (1st Cir.2001) (noting post-conviction, post-appeal Rule 33 motions are collateral and that a criminal defendant has no Sixth Amendment right to an attorney in such a proceeding); Johnson v. United States, 246 F.3d 655, 658 (6th Cir.2001) (“[A] delayed Rule 33 motion is a collateral challe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Segura Et Ux.
v.
Texas Department of Human Services
v.
Texas Department of Human Services
02-290.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 2002.
537 U.S. 975
Published
SEGURA ET UX.
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ET AL.
No. 02-290.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 21, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 37 Fed. Appx. 87.