English v. Vazquez, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004). · Go Syfert
English v. Vazquez, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
111 citation events (111 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Morales-Castro, A. (pasuperct, 2020-08-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Morales-Castro, A.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ford, 809 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004) (finding constitutional claims and allegations of trial court error waived where not raised on direct appeal).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Mac, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ford, 809 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004) (finding constitutional claims and allegations of trial court error waived where not raised on direct appeal).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Usanga, P.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ford, 809 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004) (finding constitutional claims and allegations of trial court error waived where not raised on direct appeal).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Preston P., a juvenile
Mass. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paquette v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 121, 129 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Gibson, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Ford, 809 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004) (finding claims of prosecutorial misconduct waived under the PCRA where appellant could have raised them on direct appeal, but failed to do so.).
cited Cited "see" Bridgeman v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District
Mass. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paquette v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 121, 131 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Perkins
Mass. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Because a prosecutor must meet this “directed verdict” standard, id., and because he must do so by presenting evidence that would be admissible at trial rather than reliable hearsay, id. at 849 n.6; see Paquette v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 121, 132 (2003), cert, denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004), I agree with the court that the obligation in § 38 to conduct a probable cause hearing “ ‘as soon as may be’ must be interpreted in a manner that affords the Commonwealth enough time reasonably to marshal and present the quantity and quality of evidence that is necessary to meet the probable caus…
cited Cited "see" Duane Turner v. State of Indiana
Ind. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Overstreet v. State, 783 N.E.2d 1140, 1165 (Ind.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1145 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Mass. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paquette v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 121, 131 (2003), cert, denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mounts
Wash. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shepard v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 1254, 1264 , 161 L.Ed.2d 205 (2005) (Thomas, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) (noting that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) "has been eroded by this Court's subsequent Sixth Amendment jurisprudence, and a majority of the Court now recognizes that Almendarez-Torres was wrongly decided"). [11] United States v. Jones, 332 F.3d 688, 695-96 (3rd Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1145 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004); United States v. Smalley, 294 F.3d 1030,…
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Lester L.
Mass. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paquette v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 121, 133 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004), citing Querubin v. Commonwealth, 440 Mass. 108, 118 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Sorto v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Diemer, 57 Mass.App.Ct. 677 , 785 N.E.2d 1237, 1243-45 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1144 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004) (collecting cases and joining those courts which have held that suppression of evidence for a Vienna Convention violation is not an available remedy). 37 . 2001 I.CJ. 104 (June 27, 2001). 38 . 2004 I.CJ. 128 (March 31, 2004). 39 .
discussed Cited "see" Sorto, Walter Alexander
Tex. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Diemer , 785 N.E.2d 1237, 1243-45 (Mass. App. 2003), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 1150 (2004) (collecting cases and joining those courts which have held that suppression of evidence for a Vienna Convention violation is not an available remedy). 37. 2001 I.C.J. 104 (June 27, 2001). 38. 2004 I.C.J. 128 (March 31, 2004). 39.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Joshua John Burge
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
Since Tighe , the majority of courts have followed the Tighe dissent: “If juvenile adjudications are constitutionally sound according to the more limited set of rights afforded in juvenile proceedings, they may be used to increase a defendant’s sentence for a later crime.” State v. Hitt, 273 Kan. 224, 235 , 42 P.3d 732, 739 , (Kan.2002); accord United States v. Jones, 332 F.3d 688 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1145 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004); United States v. Smalley, 294 F.3d 1030 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1114 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed.2d 790 (2003…
discussed Cited "see" Ryle v. State (2×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jones, 332 F.3d 688 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1145 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004); United States v. Smalley, 294 F.3d 1030 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1114 , 123 S.Ct. 870 , 154 L.Ed.2d 790 (2003); State v. Hitt, 273 Kan. 224 , 42 P.3d 732 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1104 , 123 S.Ct. 962 , 154 L.Ed.2d 772 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Cunningham, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Ford, 809 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2002) (holding that petitioner’s claims of trial court error, constitutional error, and prosecutorial misconduct, which could have been raised on direct appeal but were not, were waived under the PCRA), certiorari denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Austin, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Ford, 809 A.2d 325, 329 (Pa. 2002) (holding that petitioner’s claims of trial court error, constitutional error, and prosecutorial misconduct, which could have been raised on direct appeal but were not, were waived under the PCRA), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004). -7- J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Steele (2×)
Pa. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Commonwealth v. Bracey, 568 Pa. 264 , 795 A.2d 935, 948-57 (2001) (Castille, J., concurring); see also Commonwealth v. Ford, 570 Pa. 378 , 809 A.2d 325 , 346 n. 8 (2002) (Castille, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1144 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Weber
Wash. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jones, 332 F.3d 688, 696 (3d Cir.2003) (juvenile proceedings provide sufficient procedural safeguards to qualify under the prior conviction exception), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1145 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004); United States v. Smalley, 294 F.3d 1030, 1032-33 (8th Cir.2002) (juvenile adjudications are prior convictions for Apprendi purposes); United States v. Burge, 407 F.3d 1183, 1190 (11th Cir.) (holding, based on Jones and Smalley , that juvenile adjudications provide sufficient procedural safeguards to qualify as prior conviction), cert. denied, ___…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Weber
Wash. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jones, 332 F.3d 688, 696 (3d Cir. 2003) (juvenile proceedings provide sufficient procedural safeguards to qualify under the prior conviction exception), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 (2004); United States v. Smalley, 294 F.3d 1030, 1032-33 (8th Cir. 2002) (juvenile adjudications are prior convictions for Apprendi purposes); United States v. Burge, 407 F.3d 1183, 1190 (11th Cir.) (holding, based on Jones and Smalley , that juvenile adjudications provide sufficient procedural safeguards to qualify as prior conviction), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 981 (2005); People v. Superi…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Brown (2×)
Pa. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See generally Commonwealth v. McGill, 574 Pa. 574 , 832 A.2d 1014 (2003); see also Commonwealth v. Ford, 570 Pa. 378 , 809 A.2d 325, 337 (2002) (Saylor, J., concurring), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1150 , 124 S.Ct. 1144 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
English
v.
Vazquez, Judge, United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
No. 03-735.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 2004.
540 U.S. 1150
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.