green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tilson
See United States v. Ellis, 326 F.3d 593, 599-600 (4th Cir.) (holding that sentence exceeding statutory maximum by twenty years did not affect substantial rights because defendant received equal or longer concurrent sentences on other counts), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 907 , 124 S.Ct. 204 , 157 L.Ed.2d 194 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Ellis, 326 F.3d 593, 599-600 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 907 , 124 S.Ct. 204 , 157 L.Ed.2d 194 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
(2005)
See United States v. Ellis, 326 F.3d 593 , 596-98 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 907 (2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Koriakov
See, e.g., United States v. Henry, 325 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 907 , 124 S.Ct. 203 , 157 L.Ed.2d 194 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. White
See, e.g., United States v. Ellis, 326 F.3d 593, 599-600 (4th Cir.) (holding that sentence exceeding statutory maximum by at least 20 years did not affect defendant’s substantial rights because defendant received equal or longer concurrent sentences on other counts), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 907 (2003); Moore, 11 F.3d at 481-82 (holding that statements by prosecutor during closing argument that defendant and coconspira- tor were "liars," though "highly improper," did not affect defendant’s substantial rights because record showed that statements did not affect outcome of trial; expressly ref…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Gerald White, Sr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ellis, 326 F.3d 593, 599-600 (4th Cir.) (holding that sentence exceeding statutory maximum by at least 20 years did not affect defendant’s substantial rights because defendant received equal or longer concurrent sentences on other counts), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 907 , 124 S.Ct. 204 , 157 L.Ed.2d 194 (2003); Moore, 11 F.3d at 481-82 (holding that statements by prosecutor during closing argument that defendant and coconspirator were “liars,” though “highly improper,” did not affect defendant’s substantial rights because record showed that statements did no…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gerstner
v.
Garcia, Warden
v.
Garcia, Warden
03-5402.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
Published
GERSTNER
v.
GARCIA, WARDEN.
No. 03-5402.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied.