green
Positive treatment
Hot · 147 in 5y
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.4 score
“he supreme court has made it perfectly clear that the right to present a 'complete' defense is not an unlimited right to ride roughshod over reasonable evidentiary restrictions.”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bowen v. Haney
he supreme court has made it perfectly clear that the right to present a 'complete' defense is not an unlimited right to ride roughshod over reasonable evidentiary restrictions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Liang v. USA - 2255
See United States v. Sosa, 364 F.3d 507, 512 (4th Cir. 2004). “[T]o be entitled to equitable tolling, an otherwise time-barred petitioner must present ‘(1) extraordinary circumstances, (2) beyond his control or external to his own conduct, (3) that prevented him from filing on time.’” Id. (citing Rouse v. Lee, 339 F.3d 238, 246 (4th Cir. 2003) (en banc), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 (2004)).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Calvin Taylor, II v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
(2×)
See Taylor v. State, 855 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2003), cert. denied, Taylor v. Florida, 541 U.S. 905 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark
(2×)
See State v. Tate, 01-1658, p. 6 (La. 5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 929 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004) (“The trier of fact makes credibility determinations and may, within the bounds of rationality, 14fiaccept or reject the testimony of any witness; thus, a reviewing court may impinge upon the fact finder’s discretion ‘only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.’”) (citing State v. Mussall, 523 So.2d at 1310 ), In the instant case, the jury determined that the testimony of the State’s witnesses was m…
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Vasbinder
See Clifford v. Chandler, 333 F.3d 724, 728 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1601 , 158 L.Ed.2d 247 (2004); Walker v. Russell, 57 F.3d 472, 475 (6th Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jacobs
See State v. Tate, 01-1658, pp. 7-8 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 930 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004), wherein the supreme court stated, “An individual may be convicted only for those crimes for which he personally has the requisite intent.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Aros
See Rouse v. Lee, 339 F.3d 238, 248-49 (4th Cir.2003) (en banc) cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); Modrowski v. Mote, 322 F.3d 965, 967-68 (7th Cir.2003); see also United States v. Martin, 408 F.3d 1089, 1093 (8th Cir.2005) (“[S]erious attorney misconduct, as opposed to mere negligence, may warrant equitable tolling.”) (quotation marks omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Salyers v. State
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Dewberry v. State
See Taylor v. State, 855 So.2d 1 (Fla.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); Enich v. State, 838 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Banks
See also State v. Tate, 01-1658, p. 20 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 937 , cert, denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
See also State v. Tate, 01-1658, p. 20 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 937 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Fasola, 04-902, p. 19 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 901 So.2d 533, 545 , writ denied, 05-1069 (La.12/9/05), 916 So.2d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacobs
See also State v. Tate, 01-1658, p. 20 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 937 , cert. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004); State v. Fasola, 04-902, p. 19 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/29/05), 901 So.2d 533, 545 , writ denied, 05-1069 (La.12/9/05), 916 So.2d 1055 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arcoren
Martin, 408 F.3d at 1093 ; see also Rouse v. Lee, 339 F.3d 238, 248-49 (4th Cir.2003) (noting that basic attorney errors are usually insufficient to support equitable tolling), ce rt. denied, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1605 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Adams
See also State v. Tate, 2001-1658, p. 4 (La.5/20/03), 851 So.2d 921, 928 , cert. denied stib nom., Tate v. Louisiana, 541 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Coar
v.
MacFarland Administrator, South Woods State Prison
v.
MacFarland Administrator, South Woods State Prison
03-8138.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Kentucky (1)
COAR
v.
MacFARLAND, ADMINISTRATOR, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, ET AL.
No. 03-8138.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 8, 2004.
1
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.