Aquamar S. A. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 543 U.S. 1177 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Aquamar S. A. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 543 U.S. 1177 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
72 citation events (72 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bucio v. Sutherland (ohsd, 2009-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bucio v. Sutherland (2×)
S.D. Ohio · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Clinkscale v. Carter, 375 F.3d 430 , 445 n. 11 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1177 , 125 S.Ct. 1316 , 161 L.Ed.2d 162 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Weaver (2×)
Minn. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Caulfield, 722 N.W.2d at 311-12; see also State v. Alvarez-Lopez, 136 N.M. 309 , 98 P.3d 699, 703-05 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1177 , 125 S.Ct. 1334 , 161 L.Ed.2d 162 (2005) (defendant did not forfeit his right to confrontation under Crawford by absconding from state and remaining fugitive for seven years).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Weber
Wash. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La. 7/6/04), 879 So. 2d 1276, 1289 (holding that juvenile adjudications are not convictions for the purposes of the prior conviction exception), ce rt. denied, 543 U.S. 1177 (2005); State v. Harris, 339 Or. 157, 172-75 , 118 P.3d 236 (2005) (holding that juvenile adjudications are not convictions under Oregon law and may not be used as sentence enhancement factors unless admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury). ¶16 However, the majority of jurisdictions that have considered this issue have reached the opposite conclusion and held that juvenile adjudi…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Weber
Wash. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Brown, 03-2788 (La.7/06/04), 879 So.2d 1276, 1289 (holding that juvenile adjudications are not convictions for the purposes of the prior conviction exception), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1177 , 125 S.Ct. 1310 , 161 L.Ed.2d 161 (2005); State v. Harris, 339 Or. 157, 172-75 , 118 P.3d 236 (2005) (holding that juvenile adjudications are not convictions under Oregon law and may not be used as sentence enhancement factors unless admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury). ¶ 16 However, the majority of jurisdictions that have considered this issue have reached the opposite conclu…
Aquamar S. A.
v.
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
04-851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2005.
543 U.S. 1177
O'Connor.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.