green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bassine v. Hill
See United States v. Mazzola, 217 F.R.D. 84 (D.Mass.2003) (concluding that societal interest in guarding the confidentiality of communications between a therapist and client were outweighed by a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to effectively prepare and cross examine a witness); United States v. Lindstrom, 698 F.2d 1154, 1166 (11th Cir.1983) (same); see also Dispennett, 2001 WL 34039134 at *10-11 (finding Due *1186 Process Clause overcame federal psychotherapist-patient privilege in habeas corpus action where petitioner sought review of victim’s mental health records); but see Ne…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Lloyd
defendants' due process rights would be implicated if tire subject witness was coerced into making false statements and those statements were admitted against defendants at trial
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Heironimus
See State v. Daniels, 278 Kan. 53, 62 , 91 P.3d 1147 (holding that the omission of an essential element of an offense from the jury instructions is subject to the harmless error test), cert. denied 543 U.S. 982 (2004).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Huerta-Alvarez
(3×)
See State v. Daniels, 278 Kan. 53, 62-63 , 91 P.3d 1147 , cert. denied 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S.Ct. 485 , 160 L.Ed.2d 361 (2004); State v. Reyna, 290 Kan. 666 , Syl. ¶ 9, 234 P.3d 761 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sapp
See State v. Myers, 359 S.C. 40 , 596 S.E.2d 488 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 980 , 125 S.Ct. 485 , 160 L.Ed.2d 359 (2004) (exclusion of testimony is harmless where it is cumulative to other testimony in the record); State v. Mitchell, 286 S.C. 572 , 336 S.E.2d 150 (1985); State v. Gaskins, 284 S.C. 105, 127 , 326 S.E.2d 132, 145 (erroneous admission of evidence in sentencing phase may be reviewed for harmless error), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1120 , 105 S.Ct. 2368 , 86 L.Ed.2d 266 (1985), ovemded in part on other grounds State v. Torrence, 305 S.C. 45 , 406 S.E.2d 315 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Turner
See State v. Daniels, 278 Kan. 53, 57 , 91 P.3d 1147 , cert. denied 543 U.S. 982 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Coltherst
See State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 325 , 844 A.2d 866 , cert, denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert, denied, 543 U.S. 982 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Parker
See State v. Hambright, 310 Kan. 408 , 419-420, 447 P.3d 972 (2019); see also State v. Daniels, 278 Kan. 53, 64 , 91 P.3d 1147 , cert. denied 543 U.S. 982 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quaranta v. King
Compare State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315 , 327 n.7, 844 A.2d 866 (2004) (inadequate record where defendant failed to mark as exhibit for identification document included in appendix to her brief), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gonzalez
See, e.g., State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 326 , 844 A.2d 866 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. JOSE G.
(2×)
Compare State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 326 , 844 A.2d 866 (“the record reveals that the substance of what the defendant claims was improperly admitted testimony merely was cumulative of other validly admitted evidence” [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
(2×)
State v. Bornholt, 261 Kan. 644, 653 , 932 P.2d 964 (1977); see also State v. Daniels, 278 Kan. 53, 66 , 91 P.3d 1147 , cert. denied 125 S. Ct. 485 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Christoforo
Tait, Connecticut Evidence (3d Ed. 2001) § 8.16.3 (c), pp. 589-90; see also State v. Calderon, 82 Conn. App. 315, 325 , 844 A.2d 866 (statements made out of court by party opponent universally admissible when offered against him as long as statements relevant, material to issues in case), cert, denied, 270 Conn. 905 , 853 A.2d 523 , cert, denied, 543 U.S. 982 , 125 S. Ct. 487 , 160 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Milton
v.
Farwell, Warden
v.
Farwell, Warden
04-6523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Kansas (1)
MILTON
v.
FARWELL, WARDEN.
No. 04-6523.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 8, 2004.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.