green
Positive treatment
Trending · 247 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.3 score
“courts must enforce jurisdictional rules sua sponte, even in the face of a litigant's forfeiture or waiver”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United States
courts must enforce jurisdictional rules sua sponte, even in the face of a litigant's forfeiture or waiver
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Jose Alfredo Ochoa-Garcia
United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jovan Simon
See United States v. Fox, 393 F.3d 52 , 61 n. 9 (1st Cir.2004) (holding that testimony implying officer had fabricated account of stop was material due to impeachment value), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2949 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Udo Udo Ekpo, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Corley
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hansa L. Christopher
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Horn
See United States v. Thomas, 389 F.3d 424 (3d Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2953 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005) (stating, in the context of a federal criminal trial, that defendants do not have a right to be “advised of possible defenses, such as voluntary intoxication, during [a] plea colloquy”); United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 573-74 , 109 S.Ct. 757 , 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989) (“Relinquishment derives not from any inquiry into a defendant’s subjective understanding of the range of potential defenses, but from the admissions necessarily made upon entry of…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Segalla
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderick D. WIlliams
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenn Chiesa
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arnold Sylvester Lindsay, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Tobin
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William D. Morris
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. LaQuan Carter
See Pirani, 406 F.3d at 553 (quoting United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Laquan Dwayne Carter, Also Known as \Quan
See Pirani, 406 F.3d at 553 (quoting United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Isaac Jerome Smith
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United States
See Folden v. United States, 379 F.3d 1344, 1354 (Fed.Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 865 (2005); Fanning, Phillips & Molnar v. West, 160 F.3d 717, 720 (Fed.Cir.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Jerome Bell
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude Lee Woods
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wyatt Henderson
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005); see also United States v. Schulte, 264 F.3d 656, 662 (6th Cir.2001) (persuasive authority) (reviewing for plain error the appellant’s argument, made for the first time on appeal, that the district court erred by failing to obtain an updated PSI for resentencing).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Marion Holliman, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacky Bernard
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.) cert. denied 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Espinoza-Guerrero
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecilia Henry
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher James Williams
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.) cert. denied 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Julio Mejia Hernandez
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terence Devon Hamilton
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1299 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eligio Perez
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 , *807 1299 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keefer Jones
(2×)
See United States v. Jones, 389 F.3d 753, 757-58 (7th Cir.2004), vacated, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2948 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005) (remanding for resen-tencing in light of Booker).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Lamar Williams
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1299 (11th Cir.2005), cert, denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geneva Ellwood
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005) (noting that Booker specifically provides for extra-verdict enhancements in all future sentencings and that the same extra-verdict enhancement provisions apply after Booker as before).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fox
See Fox v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2949 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lockridge
(2×)
See, e.g., Rodriguez v United States, 545 US 1127 ; 125 S Ct 2935 ; 162 L Ed 2d 866 (2005). 34 defendants sentenced after our decision today, the traditional-plain error review from Carines will apply.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore Richards
United States v. Miller, 673 F.3d 688, 696 (7th Cir.2012) (“[Ajdmission of prior drug crimes to prove intent to commit present drug crimes has become too routine.”); see also United States v. Jones, 389 F.3d 753, 756-58 (7th Cir.2004), vacated. on other grounds by 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2948 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ford
See, e.g., United States v. Fox, 393 F.3d 52, 59 (1st Cir. 2004) (holding that “there was justification for stopping [defendant’s] vehicle” where officer “encountered a vehicle that appeared to be without a working plate light”), vacated on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 162 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stone
“When the district court applies the Guidelines in an advisory manner, nothing in Booker prohibits district courts from making, under a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard, additional factual findings that go beyond a defendant’s admissions.” United States v. Smith, 480 F.3d 1277, 1281 (11th Cir.2007), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 175 , 169 L.Ed.2d 119 (2007); see also United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1300 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (recognizing that “the use of extra-verdict enhancements in a non-mandatory guidel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oung
First, “Miranda warnings need not precede questions reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or for the safety of arresting officers so long as the questioning relates to an objectively reasonable need to protect the police or the public from any immediate danger.” Id. (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Fox, 393 F.3d 52, 60 (1st Cir.2004), vac’d on other grounds, 545 U.S. 1125 , 125 S.Ct. 2949 , 162 L.Ed.2d 864 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc.
v.
Cardegna
v.
Cardegna
No. 04-1264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari granted.