Maine v. Patterson, 546 U.S. 815 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Maine v. Patterson, 546 U.S. 815 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Matter of Plattsburgh Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. City of Plattsburgh (nyappdiv, 2026-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Matter of Plattsburgh Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. City of Plattsburgh (2×)
N.Y. App. Div. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
Conservation , ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2025 NY Slip Op 06231, *4 [3d Dept 2025]; Matter of O'Neill v New York State Tax Appeals Trib. , 238 AD3d 1397, 1400 [3d Dept 2025]; see generally Matter of Crown Communication N.Y., Inc. v Department of Transp. of State of N.Y. , 4 NY3d 159, 166 [2005], cert denied 546 US 815 [2005]; Armenia v Luther , 152 AD2d 928, 928 [4th Dept 1989], lv dismissed 75 NY2d 765 [1989]; Dunn v Town of Warwick , 146 AD2d 601, 604 [2d Dept 1989]). [FN1] Finally, petitioners maintain that the Common Council violated the intent of Local Law No. 5 by using it to advance the subject…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Gross
Kan. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Patterson, 868 A.2d 188 (Me.), cert. denied 546 U.S. 815 (2005); Borowicz v. N.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joseph Boulton v. Christopher Swanson
6th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Graham v. City of Mentor, 118 Fed.Appx. 27, 31 (6th Cir.2004) (upholding the constitutionality of a similar police code against facial and as-applied challenges), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 815 , 126 S.Ct. 340 , 163 L.Ed.2d 51 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ash v. Board of Managers of the 155 Condominium
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
A “prior restraint” on speech is “a law, regulation or judicial order that suppresses speech—or provides for its suppression at the discretion of government officials—on the basis of the speech’s content and in advance of its actual expression” (United States v Quattrone, 402 F3d 304, 309 [2005]; see also Hobbs v County of Westchester, 397 F3d 133, 148 [2005], cert denied 546 US 815 [2005]), and it has long been established that such restraints “are the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights” (Nebraska Press Assn. v Stuart, 427 US 539, 559…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maine
v.
Patterson
No. 04-1491.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
546 U.S. 815
Published

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Cer-tiorari denied.