Florida v. Rabb, 549 U.S. 1052 (2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Florida v. Rabb, 549 U.S. 1052 (2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
123 citation events (122 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nina Lopez v. Tarrant County, Texas (texapp, 2015-08-28) · Strongest negative: Hoop v. State (indctapp, 2009-07-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "but see" Hoop v. State (3×)
Ind. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see State v. Rabb, 920 So.2d 1175, 1183-86 (Fla. 4th Dist.Ct.App.2006) (following Thomas), review denied 933 So.2d 522 (Fla.2006), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1052 , 127 S.Ct. 665 , 166 L.Ed.2d 513 (2006), disagreed with by Stabler v. State, 990 So.2d 1258, 1260-61 (Fla. 1st Dist.Ct.App.2008); State v. Ortiz, 257 Neb. 784 , 600 N.W.2d 805, 807 (Neb.1999) (followed Thomas and concluded Fourth Amendment and Nebraska Constitution required officers to have reasonable, articulable suspicion before having dog sniff for drugs at threshold of a dwelling). 5 .
discussed Cited "see" Nina Lopez v. Tarrant County, Texas
Tex. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, 172 S.W.3d 630 , 633–34, 638 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, 22 pets. denied), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 (2006) (reasoning that law of the case doctrine applied even though disputed holding was from a different court of appeals where appellant provided “no argument regarding changed issues or facts”).
discussed Cited "see" Nina Lopez v. Tarrant County, Texas
Tex. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, 172 S.W.3d 630 , 633–34, 638 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, 22 pets. denied), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 (2006) (reasoning that law of the case doctrine applied even though disputed holding was from a different court of appeals where appellant provided “no argument regarding changed issues or facts”).
discussed Cited "see" Ex Parte Jose Moreno
Tex. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kniatt v. State, 206 S.W.3d 657, 664 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 , 127 S.Ct. 667 , 166 L.Ed.2d 514 (2006); Ex parte Mello, 355 S.W.3d 827, 832 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2011, pet. refd); Ex parte Karlson, 282 S.W.3d 118, 127 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2009, pets. ref'd).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patterson
La. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Willis, 05-218 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/2/05) , 915 So.2d 365 , writ denied, 06-186 (La.6/23/06), 930 So.2d 973 , cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 , 127 S.Ct. 668 , 166 L.Ed.2d 514 (2006) (citing State v. Narcisse, 426 So.2d 118 (La.1983), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 202 , 78 L.Ed.2d 176 (1983) and State v. Givens, 99-3518 (La.1/17/01), 776 So.2d 443 ).
cited Cited "see" Knapp v. Wilson N. Jones Memorial Hospital
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, 172 S.W.3d 630, 640 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no *171 pet.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 , 127 S.Ct. 666 , 166 L.Ed.2d 514 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ex Parte Mello
Tex. App. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Garcia, 353 S.W.3d at 787 -; see also Kniatt v. State, 206 S.W.3d 657, 664 (Tex. Crim.App.), cert, denied, 549 U.S. 1052 , 127 S.Ct. 667 , 166 L.Ed.2d 514 (2006); Ex parte Karlson, 282 S.W.3d 118, 127 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2009, pet. refd); Ex parte Twine, 111 S.W.3d 664, 665 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2003, pet. refd).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." VANDERBILT MORTG. AND FINANCE, INC. v. Flores
S.D. Tex. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Bestfoods, 524 U.S. 51, 61 , 118 S.Ct. 1876 , 141 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); see also Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Gov’t of Turkmenistan, 447 F.3d 411, 416 (5th Cir.2006), cert, denied, 549 U.S. 1051 , 127 S.Ct. 664 , 166 L.Ed.2d 513 (2006) ("Bridas II”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jones
La. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Willis, 05-218, (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/2/05), 915 So.2d 365 , writ denied, 06-186 (La.6/23/06), 930 So.2d 973 , cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 , 127 S.Ct. 668 , 166 L.Ed.2d 514 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ralph Plemons, M.D. v. Patricia Harris, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Harvey Harris
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Banda, 955 S.W.2d at 272 ; see also Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, 172 S.W.3d 630 , 639–40 (Tex. 6 App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (“To have preserved error, a party’s argument on appeal must comport with its argument in the trial court.”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1052 (2006); Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. Baker, 65 S.W.3d 140, 151 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, pet. denied) (“[G]iven that the contention before us does not comport with the objection raised below, that before us was and is waived.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ralph Plemons, M.D. v. Patricia Harris, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Harvey Harris
Tex. App. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Banda , 955 S.W.2d at 272 ; see also Wohlfahrt v. Holloway , 172 S.W.3d 630 , 639–40 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (“To have preserved error, a party’s argument on appeal must comport with its argument in the trial court.”), cert. denied , 549 U.S. 1052 (2006); Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. Baker , 65 S.W.3d 140, 151 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, pet. denied) (“[G]iven that the contention before us does not comport with the objection raised below, that before us was and is waived.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FLORIDA
v.
JAMES RABB
06-309.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 2006.
549 U.S. 1052
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.