Campbell v. United States, 568 U.S. 802 (2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Campbell v. United States, 568 U.S. 802 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shanton v. USA - 2255 (mdd, 2023-04-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017 2021 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Shanton v. USA - 2255
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Shanton, 462 F. App’x 297 (4th Cir. 2012), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 568 U.S. 802 (2012); United States v. Shanton, 513 F. App’x 265 (4th Cir. 2013).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Undrae Moseby
7th Cir. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Campbell, 659 F.3d 607, 612 (7th Cir. 2011) (discussing im- portance of unequivocal demand and rationale for require- ment), vacated on other grounds, 568 U.S. 802 (2012). 12 Nos. 19-3476, et al.
discussed Cited "see" Young v. Gila Reg'l Med. Ctr.
N.M. Ct. App. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gray, 669 F.3d 556, 564-65 (5th Cir. 2012) (stating that proctoscopic examination of the plaintiff’s anus “targeted an area of the body that is highly personal and private”), vacated on other grounds by 568 U.S. 802 (2012); Blackburn v. Snow, 771 F.2d 556, 564 (1st Cir. 1985) (describing a visual and manual body cavity inspection as “perhaps the greatest personal indignity searching officials can visit upon an individual” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Mary Beth G. v. City of Chicago, 723 F.2d 1263, 1272 (7th Cir. 1983) (describing body cavity …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Elana Gordon
Mass. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Munoz, 461 Mass. 126, 128-131 (2011), vacated and remanded, 568 U.S. 802 (2012) (Commonwealth conceded that substitute expert's testimony on direct examination as to "the procedure [the nontestifying analyst] followed in weighing and analyzing the contents of the bags" as well as "conclusions . . . by [the absent analyst] violated the defendant's right of confrontation").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James Freeman v. Guy Pierce
7th Cir. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Vacillating Positions on Representation In order to effectively raise the right to self-representation, the request must be made “clearly and unequivocally.” See Faretta, 422 U.S. at 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 ; see also United States v. Campbell, 659 F.3d 607, 612 (7th Cir. 2011), vacated on other grounds, 568 U.S. 802 , — S.Ct. —, 184 L.Ed.2d 1 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Campbell
v.
United States
No. 11-1458.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2012.
568 U.S. 802
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Dorsey v. United States, 567 U. S. 260 (2012).