green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Jones
But see United State s v. Hall, 495 Fed.Appx. 319, 327 (4th Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2734 , 186 L.Ed.2d 195 (2013) (S.C.Code § 16-11-313 meets "the basic requirement for classifying a burglary, as a qualifying violent, felony for ACCA purposes: unlawful entry into a physical structure with the intent to commit a crime.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jacques
See State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 520–21, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (overruled on other grounds by State v. Elson, 311 Conn. 726 , 91 A.3d 862 (2014)), cert. denied, 569 U.S. 1005 , 133 S. Ct. 2744 , 186 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Patel
See, e.g., State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 516 n.16, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Elson, 311 Conn. 726 , 728 n.14, 754, 91 A.3d 862 (2014)), cert. denied, 569 U.S. 1005 , 133 S. Ct. 2744 , 186 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lebrick
C Turning to the merits of the defendant’s claim, we focus our analysis on the confrontation clause because the definition of unavailability is the same under both our rules of evidence and the confrontation clause, but the ultimate determination of whether the state’s efforts are constitutionally sufficient to establish the unavail- ability of the witness is a question of law reviewed de novo.10 See part I A of this opinion; see also State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 516 n.16, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (recognizing our ‘‘general practice of not addressing constitutional questions unless t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles Allen HALL
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12–8306..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 2013.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.