L.Y.N.N. v. Commonwealth, 514 S.E.2d 147 (Va. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
L.Y.N.N. v. Commonwealth, 514 S.E.2d 147 (Va. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
113 citation events (95 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth of Virginia & Dep't of Transp. v. AMEC Civil, LLC, No. 2134112 (Va. Ct. App. May 22, 2012)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 150 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • Commonwealth of Virginia v. AMEC Civil, LLC, 677 S.E.2d 633 (Va. Ct. App. 2009).published 2 cites
    “When this occurs, the ‘reduced activity’ contract no longer ‘absorbs’ its share of overhead costs.” Fairfax County Redev., 257 Va. at 388 , 514 S.E.2d at 150 (citation omitted).
  • AMEC Civil, LLC v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1961082 (Va. Ct. App. June 16, 2009).published 2 cites
    “When this occurs, the ‘reduced activity’ contract no longer ‘absorbs’ its share of overhead costs.” Fairfax County Redev., 257 Va. at 388 , 514 S.E.2d at 150 (citation omitted).
At page 152 Criticism of the eichleay method for damages calculation1 citing case
  • Commonwealth of Virginia & Dep't of Transp. v. AMEC Civil, LLC, No. 2134112 (Va. Ct. App. May 22, 2012).unpublished 3 cites
    The Court noted the Eichleay method “has been criticized as an inadequate substitute for direct evidence of the actual amount of damages and ‘no less speculative’ than other unsupported opinion evidence simply ‘because it was cast in a mat…
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Robert Scott LYNN
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.
981146.
Supreme Court of Virginia.
Feb 26, 1999.
Published opinion
514 S.E.2d 147
1999 Va. LEXIS 37
Per Curiam.
Published

Roger D. Groot, Buena Vista, for appellant.

Leah A. Darron, Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Present: All the Justices.

PER CURIAM.

We awarded this appeal to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Virginia holding that the Circuit Court of Rockbridge County properly refused defendant's proffered Instruction L on "cooling off," Instruction O on "right to arm," and Instruction S on "relative strength and size" of the parties. Lynn v. Commonwealth, 27 Va.App. 336, 499 S.E.2d 1 (1998).

For the reasons stated on the above issues in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the judgment entered below.

Affirmed.