Theismann v. Theismann, 479 S.E.2d 534 (Va. Ct. App. 1996). · Go Syfert
Theismann v. Theismann, 479 S.E.2d 534 (Va. Ct. App. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
203 citation events (163 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Cited for
Other citing cases27 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Show 17 more citing cases
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph R. THEISMANN, Appellant,
v.
Jeanne C. THEISMANN, Appellee.
1092954.
Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Dec 31, 1996.
Published opinion
479 S.E.2d 534
1996 Va. App. LEXIS 818
Moon, C.J., and Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Michael A. Ward (Gannon, Cottrell & Ward, P.C., on briefs), Alexandria, for appellant.

Brian D. West (Mark A. Barondess; Erika B. Schiller; Sandground, Barondess, West & New, P.C., on brief), Vienna, for appellee.

Before MOON, C.J., and BAKER, BENTON, COLEMAN, WILLIS, ELDER, BRAY, FITZPATRICK, ANNUNZIATA and OVERTON, JJ.

UPON REHEARING EN BANC

By opinion dated June 18, 1996, a majority of a panel of this Court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va.App. 557, 471 S.E.2d 809 (1996). Upon motion of Joseph R. Theismann, we granted a rehearing en banc. Upon such rehearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for those reasons set forth in the panel's majority opinion, and, accordingly, the stay of this Court's June 18, 1996 mandate is lifted.

Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder and Annunziata would reverse the judgment of the trial court for those reasons set forth in the panel's dissenting opinion. See id. at 574, 471 S.E.2d at 817 (Annunziata, J., concurring in part, and dissenting in part).

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.