discussed Cited "see" In Re Detention of Anderson See In re Det. of Froats, 134 Wash.App. 420 , 140 P.3d 622 (2006) (holding Froats' unwanted touching of an inmate who had developmental age of five and his possession of hundreds of photos of children constituted recent overt act), review denied, 160 Wash.2d 1022 , 163 P.3d 795 (2007); State v. McNutt, 124 Wash.App. 344, 351 , 101 P.3d 422 (2004) ("Although the act of communicating here involved a girl rather than boys, we conclude that it constitutes a recent overt act."). [8] Compare with In re Detention of Broten, 130 Wash.App. 326 , 122 P.3d 942 (2005), where Broten's violation of his rele…