State v. Momah, 180 P.3d 1291 (Wash. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Momah, 180 P.3d 1291 (Wash. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Coleman (washctapp, 2009-08-17) · Strongest negative: State v. Heath (washctapp, 2009-05-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "but see" State v. Heath (4×) also: Cited "see"
Wash. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: but see · confidence high
See also State v. Frawley, 140 Wash.App. 713, 720 , 167 P.3d 593 (2007) (Division Three holding the same); but see State v. Momah, 141 Wash.App. 705, 714 , 171 P.3d 1064 (2007) (Division One holding that conducting voir dire outside of the courtroom absent an explicit order does not constitute a "closure"), review granted, 163 Wash.2d 1012 , 180 P.3d 1291 (2008). [3] ¶ 13 Where the plain language of the trial court's ruling imposes a closure, the burden is on the State to overcome the strong presumption that the courtroom was closed.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Coleman
Wash. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Momah, 141 Wash.App. 705 , 171 P.3d 1064 (2007), rev. granted in part, 163 Wash.2d 1012 , 180 P.3d 1291 (2008) (argued June 10, 2008; question is whether right to public trial was violated when trial court conducted a portion of voir dire in chambers after potential jurors asked to be questioned individually and court and both counsel agreed); State v. Strode, No. 80849-0 (argued June 10, 2008; issue is whether trial court violated right to public trial by conducting voir dire in chambers and whether defendant waived challenge by participating without objection).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
MOMAH.
81096-6.
Washington Supreme Court.
Apr 1, 2008.
180 P.3d 1291
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

Disposition of petition for review. Granted.