Setting time limits for commitment extensions under penal code
51 California opinions cite these pages1981–202612 pages cited by California courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Setting time limits for commitment extensions under penal code
- Cited for: Analyzing jurisdictional effect of commitment time limits
- Cited for: Statutory rights in commitment extension proceedings
- Cited for: Interpreting statutory time limits for extended commitment
- Cited for: Analyzing statutory time limits for commitment proceedings
- Cited for: Interpreting statutory time limits for extended commitment
- Cited for: Interpreting statutory time limits for extended commitment
- Cited for: Statutory changes regarding indeterminate commitment terms
Ranked by how often California courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
California opinions citing these pages
- People v. Dias, 170 Cal. App. 3d 756 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)
- People v. Williams, 77 Cal. App. 4th 436 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)
- People v. Fernandez, 70 Cal. App. 4th 117 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)
- People v. Minahen, 179 Cal. App. 3d 180 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)
- Arterberry v. Peet's Coffee, 122 Cal. App. 5th 33 (Cal. Ct. App. 2026)
- People v. Barner, 100 Cal. App. 5th 642 (Cal. Ct. App. 2024)
- People v. Grimes, No. E071594 (Cal. Ct. App. May 21, 2021)
- People v. Steward, No. C091715 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2021)
- People v. Steward, 278 Cal. Rptr. 3d 345 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)
- Conservatorship of E.B., 259 Cal. Rptr. 3d 281 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020)
- Conservatorship of Bryan S., 42 Cal. App. 5th 190 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)
- People v. K.P., No. D074577 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2018)
- People v. Martinez, 246 Cal. App. 4th 1226 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 108 opinions
- 86 opinions
- 90 opinions
- 123 opinions
- 32 opinions
- 32 opinions
- 78 opinions
- 24 opinions
Filed under: Statutory Time Limits and Deadlines
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law