Cal. Codes » Civil Code / DIVISION 3. OBLIGATIONS / PART 4. OBLIGATIONS ARISING FROM PARTICULAR TRANSACTIONS / TITLE 1.7. CONSUMER WARRANTIES / CHAPTER 1. Consumer Warranty Protection / ARTICLE 2. Definitions
California Codes

Cal. Civil Code § 1791.3 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, a sale “as is” or “with all faults” means that the manufacturer, distributor, and retailer disclaim all implied warranties that would otherwise attach to the sale of consumer goods under the provisions of this chapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc., 174 Cal. App. 4th 1297 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc., 174 Cal. App. 4th 1297 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “” 4 (Civ. Code, §§ 1791.3, 1792.) Merchantability, for purposes of the Song-Beverly Act, means that the consumer goods: “(1) Pass without objection in the trade under the contract description.”
In re FCA US LLC Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig., 280 F. Supp. 3d 975 (E.D. Mich. 2017). “2015) (citing Cal. Civ. Code § 1791.3 ). “The Song-Beverly Act’s implied warranty of merchantability applies to new goods ( Cal.”
Jones v. Credit Auto Ctr., Inc., 237 Cal. App. Supp. 4th 1 (Cal. App. Dep’t Super. Ct. 2015). “’ ” (Civ. Code, § 1791.3.) The Song-Beverly Act’s implied warranty of merchantability applies to new goods (Civ.”
Allen v. Similasan Corp., 306 F.R.D. 635 (S.D. Cal. 2015). “3d 285 (2009) (quoting Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1791.3,1792). Under the SBA, goods are merchantable if they “(1) [pjass without objection in the trade under the contract deseription[; ¶] (2) [a]re fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used[; ¶] (3) [a]re adequately…”
Riordan v. W. Digit. Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2023). “4th 1297, 1303 (2009) (quoting 16 Cal. Civ. Code, §§ 1791.3, 1792). Merchantability refers to whether the goods: 17 (1) Pass without objection in the trade under the contract description.”
Riordan v. W. Digit. Corp. (N.D. Cal. 2024). “4th 1297, 1303 (2009) (citing Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1791.3 , 1792); see also Daniel v.”
Clay v. Carmax Auto Superstores California CA4/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2024). “’ (Civ. Code, §§ 1791.3, 1792.) Merchantability, for purposes of the Song–Beverly Act, means that the consumer goods: ‘(1) Pass without objection in the trade under the contract description.”
Sulligan v. Ford Motor Co. (E.D. Mich. 2023). “2015) (citing Cal. Civ. Code § 1791.3 ). “The Song– Beverly Act’s implied warranty of merchantability applies to new goods ( Cal.”
Kimball v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (D.N.J. 2023). “2009) (citing Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1791.3 , 1792). The Song-Beverly Act further provides that “[t]he duration of the implied warranty of merchantability and where present the implied warranty of fitness shall be coextensive in duration with an express warranty which accompanies the…”
Reinkraut v. Fca Us LLC (D.N.J. 2024). “2009) (citing Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1791.3 , 1792). This implied warranty is “coextensive in duration with an express warranty which accompanies the consumer goods .”
Reinkraut v. Fca Us LLC (D.N.J. 2025). “2009) (citing Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1791.3 , 1792). This implied warranty is “coextensive in duration with an express warranty which accompanies the consumer goods .”
Anaya v. Kia Motors Am. CA2/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “” (Civ. Code, §§ 1791.3, 1792.)1 Merchantability gener- ally means that goods are “fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used” and “in safe condition and substantially free of defects.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.