California Codes

Cal. Commercial Code § 11103 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)In this division:

(1)“Payment order” means an instruction of a sender to a receiving bank, transmitted orally or in a record, to pay, or to cause another bank to pay, a fixed or determinable amount of money to a beneficiary if all of the following apply:

(i)The instruction does not state a condition to payment to the beneficiary other than time of payment.

(ii)The receiving bank is to be reimbursed by debiting an account of, or otherwise receiving payment from, the sender.

(iii)The instruction is transmitted by the sender directly to the receiving bank or to an agent, funds-transfer system, or communication system for transmittal to the receiving bank.

(2)“Beneficiary” means the person to be paid by the beneficiary’s bank.

(3)“Beneficiary’s bank” means the bank identified in a payment order in which an account of the beneficiary is to be credited pursuant to the order or which otherwise is to make payment to the beneficiary if the order does not provide for payment to an account.

(4)“Receiving bank” means the bank to which the sender’s instruction is addressed.

(5)“Sender” means the person giving the instruction to the receiving bank.

(b)If an instruction complying with paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) is to make more than one payment to a beneficiary, the instruction is a separate payment order with respect to each payment.

(c)A payment order is issued when it is sent to the receiving bank.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Etop Udo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (N.D. Cal. 2023).
Etop Udo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (N.D. Cal. 2023). “2 Cal. Com. Code § 11103 (a)(1). 21 Although Udo alleges that “unauthorized transactions” were made from his accounts and 22 that “fraudulent and unauthorized checks” were written, he fails to allege facts that show the 23 allegedly unauthorized transactions fall within the…”
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (N.D. Cal. 2025). “Cal. Com. Code § 11103 (a)(1). In other words, § 1102 applies to transactions 15 commonly understood as wire transfers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.