Cal. Codes » Commercial Code
California Codes

Cal. Commercial Code § 2608 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1)The buyer may revoke his acceptance of a lot or commercial unit whose nonconformity substantially impairs its value to him if he has accepted it

(a)On the reasonable assumption that its nonconformity would be cured and it has not been seasonably cured; or

(b)Without discovery of such nonconformity if his acceptance was reasonably induced either by the difficulty of discovery before acceptance or by the seller’s assurances.

(2)Revocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the ground for it and before any substantial change in condition of the goods which is not caused by their own defects. It is not effective until the buyer notifies the seller of it.

(3)A buyer who so revokes has the same rights and duties with regard to the goods involved as if he had rejected them.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1965–2025 · leading case: In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig., 754 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (C.D. Cal. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig., 754 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (C.D. Cal. 2010). · cites it 2× “Code § 2314 ; (6) Revocation of Acceptance, Cal. Com.Code § 2608; (7) Violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.”
Seely v. White Motor Co., 403 P.2d 145 (Cal. 1965). · cites it 2× “281, 330), has not been adopted by the Commercial Code (Com. Code, § 2608, comment 1), and should not be extended to apply here.”
In Re Toyota Motor Corp., 785 F. Supp. 2d 883 (C.D. Cal. 2011). “Code § 2314; (7) Revocation of Acceptance, Cal. Com.Code § 2608; (8) Violations of the MagnusonMoss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.”
In Re Toyota Motor Corp., 790 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (C.D. Cal. 2011). “Code § 2314; (6) Revocation of Acceptance, Cal. Com.Code § 2608; (7) Violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, 15 U.”
Krotin v. Porsche Cars North Am., Inc., 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7333 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995). “” Acknowledging that nonconformities in goods might be first discovered a substantial time after tender of the goods and rejection is thus no longer possible, Commercial Code section 2608, subdivision (2) provides, in pertinent part: “Revocation of acceptance must occur within a…”
Diesel Performance, Inc. v. G. Paoletti Co. (In Re G. Paoletti, Inc.), 205 B.R. 251 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1997). “Cal.Comm.Code § 2608(3). Section 2607(2) of the Commercial Code states that acceptance of goods does not “of itself’ impair any other remedy for nonconformity provided by Division 2.”
Magic Link Garment Ltd. v. ThirdLove, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). · cites it 2× “” Cal. Comm. Code § 2608 (2). 8 1. Defendant Irrevocably Accepted the 39,960 PO 542 9 Bras It Sold to Customers 10 In its opening brief, plaintiff proffered evidence showing that defendant admitted to 11 selling customers 39,960 of the 65,076 TL 50A bras and receiving over…”
Anaya v. Kia Motors Am. CA2/3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “According to Anaya, the jury reasonably could have found he satisfied all the requirements for revocation under Commercial Code section 2608 (section 2608).”
Soil Retention Prods., Inc. v. Brentwood Indus., Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2022). “8 COM. CODE § 2608(1); see also Ramos v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 55 Cal.”
Gant v. Ford Motor Co. (E.D. Mich. 2021). “, Cal. Com. Code § 2608 . Ford argues that revocation is not available against a non-seller manufacturer.”
— Cal. Commercial Code § 2608(1) — 2 cases
Magic Link Garment Ltd. v. ThirdLove, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “” Cal. Comm. Code § 2608 (2). 8 1. Defendant Irrevocably Accepted the 39,960 PO 542 9 Bras It Sold to Customers 10 In its opening brief, plaintiff proffered evidence showing that defendant admitted to 11 selling customers 39,960 of the 65,076 TL 50A bras and receiving over…”
Soil Retention Prods., Inc. v. Brentwood Indus., Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2022). “8 COM. CODE § 2608(1); see also Ramos v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 55 Cal.”
— Cal. Commercial Code § 2608(3) — 1 case
Diesel Performance, Inc. v. G. Paoletti Co. (In Re G. Paoletti, Inc.), 205 B.R. 251 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 1997). “Cal.Comm.Code § 2608(3). Section 2607(2) of the Commercial Code states that acceptance of goods does not “of itself’ impair any other remedy for nonconformity provided by Division 2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.