Cal. Codes » Corporations Code / TITLE 4. SECURITIES / DIVISION 5. FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW / PART 2. REGULATION OF THE SALE OF FRANCHISES / CHAPTER 2. Disclosure
California Codes

Cal. Corporations Code § 31111 (2026)

Disclosure

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)The application for registration of an offer shall be filed with the commissioner upon the Uniform Franchise Registration Application, as identified, modified, and supplemented by rule of the commissioner.

(b)An authorization for the commissioner to examine the registrant’s financial records of the sale of the franchise pursuant to Section 7473 of the Government Code shall be filed with the application.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1994 · leading case: Vylene Enter., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enter., Inc.), 63 B.R. 900 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vylene Enter., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enter., Inc.), 63 B.R. 900 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1986). “” California Corporations Code § 31111(k) (West 1977).”
Traumann v. Southland Corp., 858 F. Supp. 979 (N.D. Cal. 1994). · cites it 3× “Assuming, arguendo, that plaintiffs had pleaded this claim under Cal. Corp.Code § 31111(a), which superseded section 31111(k), the claim would still fail.”
Vylene Enter., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enter., Inc.), 105 B.R. 42 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1989). “The Court previously found that California Franchise Investment Law, California Corporations Code § 31111(k) (West 1988 Supp.”
Cal. Corporations Code § 31111(a): 1 case
Traumann v. Southland Corp., 858 F. Supp. 979 (N.D. Cal. 1994). “Assuming, arguendo, that plaintiffs had pleaded this claim under Cal. Corp.Code § 31111(a), which superseded section 31111(k), the claim would still fail.”
Cal. Corporations Code § 31111(k): 3 cases
Vylene Enter., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enter., Inc.), 63 B.R. 900 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1986). “” California Corporations Code § 31111(k) (West 1977).”
Vylene Enter., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In Re Vylene Enter., Inc.), 105 B.R. 42 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1989). “The Court previously found that California Franchise Investment Law, California Corporations Code § 31111(k) (West 1988 Supp.”
Traumann v. Southland Corp., 858 F. Supp. 979 (N.D. Cal. 1994). “Assuming, arguendo, that plaintiffs had pleaded this claim under Cal. Corp.Code § 31111(a), which superseded section 31111(k), the claim would still fail.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.