Upon a pupil’s initial classification as a truant, the school district shall notify the pupil’s parent or guardian using the most cost-effective method possible, which may include email or a telephone call:
(a)That the pupil is truant.
(b)That the parent or guardian is obligated to compel the attendance of the pupil at school.
(c)That alternative educational programs are available in the school district.
(d)That the parent or guardian has the right to meet with appropriate school personnel to discuss solutions to the pupil’s truancy.
(e)That mental health and supportive services may be available to the pupil and the family.
(f)That school personnel are available to meet with the pupil and family to develop strategies to support the pupil’s attendance at school.
(g)That research shows that missing 10 percent of school for any reason can translate into pupils having difficulty learning to read by third grade, achieving in middle school, and graduating from high school.
(h)This section shall become operative on July 1, 2025.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2023 · leading case:
Brekke v. Wills, 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 696 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005).
Brekke v. Wills, 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 696 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005).
“, supervision, protection, and control over their minor child” so as not to “encourage” or “cause” the child to “become or to remain a person within the provisions of Section 300 [juvenile dependency], 601 [habitually disobedient or truant], or 602 [juvenile delinquency] of the…”
People v. D.C., 188 Cal. App. 4th 978 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010).
“) Parents are also required to ensure their child’s attendance at school (Ed. Code, §§ 48260.5, subds. (b)-(c), 48293) and may be held financially responsible for a minor child’s misconduct.”
In Re Dc, 188 Cal. App. 4th 978 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010).
“) Parents are also required to ensure their child's attendance at school (Ed. Code, §§ 48260.5, subds. (b)-(c), 48293) and may be held financially responsible for a minor child's misconduct.”
Mirabelli v. Olson (S.D. Cal. 2023).
“n, protection, and control over their minor child” so as not to “encourage” 23 or “cause” the child to “become or to remain a person within the provisions of Section 24 300 [juvenile dependency], 601 [habitually disobedient or truant], or 602 [juvenile 25 delinquency] of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.