California Codes

Cal. Government Code § 12910 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)It is the intent of the Legislature in establishing the bureau to establish an initial framework and it is the intent of the Legislature that the scope and responsibilities of the bureau may expand as necessary to fulfill its mission and address additional harms as identified.

(b)It is the intent of the Legislature that, as the bureau expands its scope in the future, it shall do both of the following:

(1)Address the lasting harms of disenfranchisement, segregation, discrimination, exclusion neglect, and violence impacting both descendants and communities harmed as described in Chapters 1 to 13, inclusive, of the California Reparations Report.

(2)Advise on reparative remedies to target the persistent consequences of this legacy, guided by Chapters 14 to 33, inclusive, of the California Reparations Report.

(c)Implementation of this chapter shall be contingent upon appropriation of sufficient funding by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act or other statute for that purpose.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Gardner v. City of Berkeley, 838 F. Supp. 2d 910 (N.D. Cal. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gardner v. City of Berkeley, 838 F. Supp. 2d 910 (N.D. Cal. 2012). “Plaintiffs last request for reinstatement was made in July 2008, and a response to this request was made in August 2008, more than a year prior to Plaintiffs complaint with DFEH. Hodgkins Deck, Exh. A. Because Plaintiff makes no showing that Defendant failed to engage in a good…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.