California Codes

Cal. Government Code § 3517.7 (2026)

State Employer-Employee Relations

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the Legislature does not approve or fully fund any provision of the memorandum of understanding which requires the expenditure of funds, either party may reopen negotiations on all or part of the memorandum of understanding.

Nothing herein shall prevent the parties from agreeing and effecting those provisions of the memorandum of understanding which have received legislative approval or those provisions which do not require legislative action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: White v. Davis, 68 P.3d 74 (Cal. 2003).
White v. Davis, 68 P.3d 74 (Cal. 2003). “, specified statutory provisions that may be superseded by a conflicting provision of a memorandum of understanding], those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.