California Codes

Cal. Government Code § 54956.7 (2026)

Meetings — Powers And Duties Common To Cities, Counties, And Other Agencies

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever a legislative body of a local agency determines that it is necessary to discuss and determine whether an applicant for a license or license renewal, who has a criminal record, is sufficiently rehabilitated to obtain the license, the legislative body may hold a closed session with the applicant and the applicant’s attorney, if any, for the purpose of holding the discussion and making the determination. If the legislative body determines, as a result of the closed session, that the issuance or renewal of the license should be denied, the applicant shall be offered the opportunity to withdraw the application. If the applicant withdraws the application, no record shall be kept of the discussions or decisions made at the closed session and all matters relating to the closed session shall be confidential. If the applicant does not withdraw the application, the legislative body shall take action at the public meeting during which the closed session is held or at its next public meeting denying the application for the license but all matters relating to the closed session are confidential and shall not be disclosed without the consent of the applicant, except in an action by an applicant who has been denied a license challenging the denial of the license.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Untitled California Attorney Gen. Opinion, No. 21-1102 (Cal. Att'y Gen. May 26, 2022).
Untitled California Attorney Gen. Opinion, No. 21-1102 (Cal. Att'y Gen. May 26, 2022). “18 (“The Legislature’s addition of section 54962 has effectively eliminated the possibility of finding an implied authorization for a closed session”); California Attorney General’s Office, The Brown Act: Open Meetings for Local Legislative Bodies (2003), p.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.