Notwithstanding any other provision of law, where the State is named as a defendant in any action or proceeding for death or injury to person or personal property and the injury or the injury causing death occurred within this State, the proper court for the trial of the action is a court of competent jurisdiction in the county where the injury occurred or where the injury causing death occurred. The court may, on motion, change the place of the trial in the same manner and under the same circumstances as the place of trial may be changed where an action is between private parties.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1965–1999 · leading case:
People v. Tillman, 73 Cal. App. 4th 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
People v. Tillman, 73 Cal. App. 4th 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999).
“653 ] [Gov. Code, § 955.2].) The cases upon which appellant relies to restrict application of the “notwithstanding” language of section 1170.”
State of California v. Superior Court, 238 Cal. App. 2d 691 (Cal. Ct. App. 1965).
“Is the present petition premature in that the Sacramento Superior Court has not acted upon the motions but merely continued them for further hearing after an answer is filed? In the circumstances of the particular case the answers to these questions depend upon the import and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.