California Codes
Cal. Labor Code § 1174.5 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person employing labor who willfully fails to maintain the records required by subdivision (c) of Section 1174 or accurate and complete records required by subdivision (d) of Section 1174, or to allow any member of the commission or employees of the division to inspect records pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1174, shall be subject to a civil penalty of five hundred dollars ($500).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case: Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc., 953 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2020).
Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc., 953 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2020). “Moreover, Herrera’s complaint roots this claim in Cal. Labor Code § 1174.5 and Wage Order 7.”
Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., 311 F.R.D. 590 (C.D. Cal. 2015). “; (6) failure to maintain required records, Cal. Lab.Code § 1174.5, et seq.; (7) waiting time penalties, Cal.”
Sobaszkiewicz v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2022). “Failure to maintain payroll records (claim 8) 8 California Labor Code section 1174.5 requires “[a]ny person employing labor” to 9 “maintain the records” of employment.”
Hankey v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (E.D. Cal. 2020). “21 Plaintiff argues that this testimony is relevant to the allegations that defendant failed to 22 keep accurate payroll records pursuant to California Labor Code section 1174.5. (ECF No.”
Sam Force v. Advanced Structural Tech., Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2020). “See Cal. Lab. Code § 1174.5 ; Cleveland v. Groceryworks.”
Gabriela Valdiviezo v. Lab'y Corp. of Am. (C.D. Cal. 2021). “Code § 203 against LabCorp; (15) failure to produce records in violation of Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1174.5 and 1198.5 against LabCorp; (16) violation of Cal.”
Ramirez v. Cornerstone Bldg. Brands, Inc. (E.D. Cal. 2024). “For statutory penalties pursuant to California Labor Code section 1174.5; and 12 47.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.