California Codes

Cal. Labor Code § 50.7 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)The Department of Industrial Relations is the state agency designated to be responsible for administering the state plan for the development and enforcement of occupational safety and health standards relating to issues covered by corresponding standards promulgated under the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-596). The state plan shall be consistent with the provisions of state law governing occupational safety and health, including, but not limited to, Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 140) and Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 148) of Division 1, and Division 5 (commencing with Section 6300), of this code.

(b)The budget and budget bill submitted pursuant to Article IV, Section 12 of the California Constitution shall include in the item for the support of the Department of Industrial Relations amounts sufficient to fully carry out the purposes and provisions of the state plan and this code in a manner which assures that the risk of industrial injury, exposure to toxic substances, illness and death to employees will be minimized.

(c)Because Federal grants are available, maximum Federal funding shall be sought and, to the extent possible, the cost of administering the state plan shall be paid by funds obtained from federal grants.

(d)The Governor and the Department of Industrial Relations shall take all steps necessary to prevent withdrawal of approval for the state plan by the Federal government. If Federal approval of the state plan has been withdrawn before passage of this initiative, or if it is withdrawn at any time after passage of this initiative, the Governor shall submit a new state plan immediately so that California shall be approved and shall continue to have access to Federal funds.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1990–2018 · leading case: Solus Indus. Innovations, LLC v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., 410 P.3d 32 (Cal. 2018).
Solus Indus. Innovations, LLC v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., 410 P.3d 32 (Cal. 2018). · cites it 2× “) Within the Department, the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Board) has authority to adopt, amend, or repeal standards ( id .”
California Labor Fed'n v. California Occupational Saf. & Health Standards Bd., 1990 CCH OSHD 29,071 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “(Lab. Code, §§ 50.7, subd. (a); 6302.) In February 1987, the Governor advised the Secretary of his intent to withdraw the state plan and to return exclusive control over the administration and enforcement of occupational safety and health law in California in the private sector…”
Indus. Truck Ass'n v. Henry, 125 F.3d 1305 (9th Cir. 1997). · cites it 2× “175 (b); Cal. Lab. Code §§ 50.7 , 6302(a), and it is required to make the State Plan consistent with state laws governing occupational safety and health.”
Indus. Truck Ass'n, Inc. v. Henry, 909 F. Supp. 1368 (S.D. Cal. 1995). “” Cal.Labor Code § 50.7. The California Labor Federation Court concluded that Proposition 97 required the State Standards Board to include the provisions of Proposition 65 in the State Plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.