Cal. Codes » Penal Code / PART 2. OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE / TITLE 8. OF JUDGMENT AND EXECUTION / CHAPTER 1. The Judgment
California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 1202.44 (2026)

The Judgment

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In every case in which a person is convicted of a crime and a conditional sentence or a sentence that includes a period of probation is imposed, the court shall, at the time of imposing the restitution fine pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1202.4, assess an additional probation revocation restitution fine in the same amount as that imposed pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1202.4. This additional probation revocation restitution fine shall become effective upon the revocation of probation or of a conditional sentence, and shall not be waived or reduced by the court, absent compelling and extraordinary reasons stated on record. Probation revocation restitution fines shall be deposited in the Restitution Fund in the State Treasury.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 59 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: People v. Dueñas, 30 Cal. App. 5th 1157 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Dueñas, 30 Cal. App. 5th 1157 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019). “( Pen. Code, § 1202.44.) Dueñas asked the court to set a hearing to determine her ability to pay "the attorney fees [she had previously been assessed] and court fees.”
People v. Woods, 191 Cal. App. 4th 269 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “(Pen. Code, § 1202.44; see People v. Tillman (2000) 22 Cal.”
People v. Butcher, 247 Cal. App. 4th 310 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “The January 2, 2015 oral pronouncement of judgment is modified to omit the' additional probation revocation restitution fines (Pen. Code, § 1202.44) imposed in each case.”
People v. Morales, 224 Cal. App. 4th 1587 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “Facts The facts are based on the testimony of two Salinas police officers at the preliminary hearing.”
People v. Hunt, 213 Cal. App. 4th 13 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “The judgment is modified to impose and stay a $240 Penal Code section 1202.44 probation fine.”
People v. Gilliam, No. D080511 (Cal. Ct. App. May 5, 2023). · cites it 3× “Code, § 70373), a $300 probation revocation fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.44), a $300 restitution fine (Id.”
People v. Annis, No. C100152 (Cal. Ct. App. June 17, 2025). · cites it 3× “(b)), a corresponding $300 probation revocation fine (suspended unless probation is revoked) (Pen. Code, § 1202.44), a $40 court operations assessment (Pen.”
P. v. Harris, No. H038155 (Cal. Ct. App. June 18, 2013). · cites it 4× “SS102580; suspended probation revocation fines (Pen. Code, § 1202.44) in the same amounts as the restitution fines; criminal laboratory analysis fees (§ 11372.”
People v. Jewkes, No. C079556 (Cal. Ct. App. July 12, 2016). · cites it 2× “4th 58, 62-66 ), a matching but suspended $150 fine is not authorized under Penal Code sections 1202.44 or 1202.45. Defendant was not granted probation for the misdemeanor offense, and he is not subject to a period of parole for that offense.”
People v. Ledee, No. H038939 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 18, 2013). · cites it 2× “) The judgment is further modified to reflect that a $200 probation revocation restitution fine (Pen. Code, §1202.44) is now due. The judgment in case No.”
People v. Prater, No. H039433 (Cal. Ct. App. May 15, 2014). · cites it 2× “(b)) and a $280 stayed probation revocation restitution fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.44) as to count 1, and whether the clerk erred in recording that the trial court imposed an additional $420 restitution fund fine as to counts 2, 3, and 5.”
People v. Goodwin, No. D065291 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2014). · cites it 2× “(b)) and a $200 probation revocation fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.44). Approximately seven months later, in case number SCD233633, Goodwin pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine base (Health & Saf.”
Show all 59 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.