Cal. Codes » Penal Code / PART 2. OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE / TITLE 8. OF JUDGMENT AND EXECUTION / CHAPTER 2. The Execution
California Codes

Cal. Penal Code § 1213.5 (2026)

The Execution

✓ leginfo export of Sept. 26, 2026 (applied Oct. 1, 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The abstract of judgment provided for in Section 1213 shall be prescribed by the Judicial Council.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1961–2015 · leading case: United States v. Jose Luis Navidad-Marcos, 367 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Jose Luis Navidad-Marcos, 367 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2004). “It does not contain information as to the criminal acts to which the defendant unequivocally admitted in a plea colloquy before the court. The government would have us infer from the simple summary of the statutory title in the abstract of judgment that Navi-dad-Marcos had…”
People v. Clytus, 209 Cal. App. 4th 1001 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012). “” (Pen. Code, § 1213.5.) If a court uses a minute order in lieu of an abstract, “the first page or pages shall be identical in form and content to that prescribed by the Judicial Council for an abstract of judgment, and other matters as appropriate may be added thereafter.”
People v. Flower, 62 Cal. App. 3d 904 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976). “(Pen. Code, § 1213.5.) The requirement of information seems to be designed to aid correctional personnel in initially evaluating the defendant for purposes of confinement classification and assignment.”
In Re Mills, 361 P.2d 15 (Cal. 1961). “He was lawfully convicted of an offense for which the maximum sentence is 20 years, and he has no vested right to serve less than that maximum.”
People v. Garcia, No. E057279 (Cal. Ct. App. June 9, 2015). “(Pen. Code, § 1213.5.) The form it has prescribed (form CR-292) does not have a box or a blank for stating whether restitution is joint and several; a fortiori, it does not have a place to list the names of any co-obligors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.